区域与WTO管辖权冲突协调机制探析——以NAFTA的实践为例

发布时间：2018-05-31 03:38

本文选题：司法视角 + 管辖权冲突　；参考：《东岳论丛》2012年12期

【摘要】：区域与多边协定的并行实践引发了区域与WTO争端解决机制之间管辖权的冲突,而区域"管辖权选择条款"效力的单向性似乎无法从根本上化解这一矛盾。为此,应当寻求一种区域与多边之间的双向协调机制,通过借鉴国际民商事案件管辖权冲突处理原则自限管辖权、借助解释工具软化WTO管辖规则的硬直性、运用司法包容策略消解矛盾裁决等可能路径解决或缓和两机制间管辖权的冲突。
[Abstract]:The concurrent practice of regional and multilateral agreements leads to the conflict of jurisdiction between regional and WTO dispute settlement mechanism, but the unilateral nature of the validity of regional "jurisdiction selection clause" does not seem to be able to resolve this contradiction fundamentally. Therefore, we should seek a kind of two-way coordination mechanism between the region and the multilateral. By learning from the principle of self-limiting jurisdiction in international civil and commercial cases, we should soften the firmness of WTO jurisdiction rules by means of interpretation tools. Judicial inclusion strategy is used to resolve the conflict of jurisdiction between the two mechanisms.
【作者单位】：山东财经大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学课题规划项目《国际投资争端解决机制中的私人出诉权研究:以比较法为视角》(项目号:12YJA820070)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D996

【相似文献】