论ADR制度在中国高铁出口中的应用

发布时间：2018-05-31 13:47

本文选题：高铁 + 专家制度　；参考：《北京交通大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution)制度,作为一种纠纷解决的制度,已经广泛应用在商事、贸易、建筑业等等多个行业领域。近年来,随着中国高铁的发展,ADR制度也在高铁行业有所应用。ADR制度下有很多不同的模式,中国高铁的出口项目应用到了其中的几种模式,但这对于实践以及未来的发展还不够,本文即从实践角度出发,梳理ADR制度在中国高铁出口中已经应用到的模式,并且在此现状下提出建议,引入更多的ADR模式,完善该制度在高铁出口领域的应用。本文在调研基础上,研究了中国高铁的出口中对ADR制度的应用,并且通过分析和论证,本文建议在中国高铁出口已经适用的ADR模式上,进一步的引进、发展ADR其他模式,促进ADR制度的全面应用,以达到解决高铁出口中的纠纷的目标。在文章结构上,本文分为以下几个部分:序言部分介绍了作者的科研方法(主要包括实地采访、阅读文献等)和文献综述的基本情况。第二部分,以墨西哥高铁项目为案例,以调研结果为事实依据,介绍中国高铁的出口项目的具体情况;第三部分,梳理ADR制度的内容,进行概述,包括其内涵,特点,并且列出中国高铁出口项目中应用ADR模式的现状,主要包括FIDIC方式和谈判方式;第四部分,分析中国高铁出口项目中应用ADR制度的现状的不足;做出引入其他ADR模式的建议,并且就此建议做出可能性和可行性分析;第五部分,做出结论。本文论证了中国高铁的出口项目应用FIDIC合同的DAB程序和谈判这两种ADR程序来保障自身利益是不够的,并且做出了引入国际商会专家制度和完善仲裁制度的建议,希望用更多元化的ADR模式,保障中国高铁出口海外。
[Abstract]:ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution system, as a dispute resolution system, has been widely used in commercial, trade, construction and other industries. In recent years, with the development of high-speed rail in China, the ADR system has also been applied to the high-speed rail industry. There are many different models under the .ADR system. The export projects of China's high-speed rail have been applied to several of them, but this is not enough for practice and future development. From the point of view of practice, this paper combs the mode that ADR system has been applied in the export of high-speed rail in China, and puts forward some suggestions under the present situation, and introduces more ADR models to perfect the application of the system in the field of high-speed rail export. On the basis of investigation and research, this paper studies the application of ADR system in China's high-speed rail export, and through the analysis and demonstration, this paper proposes to further introduce and develop other ADR models on the ADR model that has already been applied in China's high-speed rail export. To promote the full application of ADR system in order to solve the disputes in high-speed rail export. In the structure of the article, this paper is divided into the following parts: the preface introduces the author's scientific research methods (including field interviews, reading literature, etc.) and the basic situation of literature review. The second part, taking Mexico high-speed rail project as a case, taking the investigation results as the factual basis, introduces the specific situation of China's high-speed rail export project; the third part, combs the content of ADR system, carries on the summary, including its connotation, the characteristic, It also lists the status quo of the application of ADR mode in China's high-speed rail export projects, mainly including the FIDIC mode and negotiation mode; part IV, analyzes the current situation of the application of ADR system in China's high-speed rail export projects, and makes suggestions for introducing other ADR models. And the possibility and feasibility analysis of this proposal; the fifth part, draw a conclusion. This paper demonstrates that it is not enough to use the DAB procedure of FIDIC contract and the ADR procedure of negotiation to protect one's own interests in the export project of China's high-speed railway, and makes some suggestions on introducing the expert system of ICC and perfecting the arbitration system. Hope to use a more diversified ADR model to protect China's high-speed rail exports overseas.
【学位授予单位】：北京交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】