投资者与国家争端仲裁中“法庭之友”制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 22:04

本文选题：法庭之友 + 投资者与国家争端仲裁　；参考：《大连海事大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着晚近国际投资时代的到来,投资者与国家争端仲裁暴露出越来越多的问题和弊端。不仅有社会公众对其程序缺乏透明性的指责,还有东道国对其偏袒投资者的不满。“法庭之友”自身的制度特征对于投资者与国家争端仲裁具有特殊的法律价值,社会公众纷纷要求投资者与国家争端仲裁引入“法庭之友”制度以平衡争端当事人的利益。面对来自各界的批判与指责,作为投资者与国家争端仲裁的核心机构—AFTA和ICSID也进行了相应的调整,从最初的司法实践再到制度变革,在一定程度上承认和吸收了“法庭之友”制度,但仍表现的相对保守。改革开放以来,我国在吸收外资和对外投资上一直保持着高速增长的态势,同时,国际投资争端也不断增多。所以,我国应该客观、理性地分析“法庭之友”引入投资者与国家争端仲裁对我国的影响,不仅要改变以往对“法庭之友”的回避态度,同时还要从国内和国际两个层面积极主动地利用“法庭之友”制度,充分地保护我国的国家利益和海外投资者的利益。本文包括引言、正文、结论三部分,正文共四章。第1章,“法庭之友”制度的演进与特质。首先,分析“法庭之友”制度在司法实践的发展、创新；其次,在“法庭之友”制度演进的基础上,总结、概括了.其制度的特质。第2章,“法庭之友”制度对投资者与国家争端仲裁的价值分析。本章划分为两部分：第一部分介绍了“法庭之友”制度对于所有争端解决程序所具有的一般法律价值；第二部分阐述了上述法律价值在当今投资者与国家争端仲裁的具体体现。第3章,本章介绍了“法庭之友”制度在解决投资者与国家争端领域具有代表性的机构NAFTA和ICSID的相关实践和成果,并在此基础上分析了现有制度所存在的问题及改进对策。第4章,我国对于投资者与国家争端仲裁中引入“法庭之友”的态度和建议。本章首先对我国在该机制中引入“法庭之友”制度所应持有的态度进行了分析,然后对我国如何应对此种变化提出了相应的建议。
[Abstract]:With the recent arrival of the international investment era, investor-state dispute arbitration has exposed more and more problems and drawbacks. Not only are there public accusations of a lack of transparency in its procedures, but host countries are dissatisfied with their favouritism. The "amicus curiae" system has special legal value for investor-state dispute arbitration, and the public demand that investor and state dispute arbitration introduce amicus curiae system in order to balance the interests of the parties to the dispute. In the face of criticism and criticism from all walks of life, AFTA and ICSID, as the core institutions of investor-state dispute arbitration, have also made corresponding adjustments, from the initial judicial practice to the institutional reform. To some extent, the amicus curiae system has been admitted and absorbed, but it is still relatively conservative. Since the reform and opening up, China has maintained a rapid growth in foreign investment and foreign investment, at the same time, the number of international investment disputes has been increasing. Therefore, China should objectively and rationally analyze the influence of the introduction of investor-state dispute arbitration by "amicus curiae" on China, and not only change its past attitude of evading the amicus curiae. At the same time, the amicus curiae system should be actively utilized at the domestic and international levels to fully protect the national interests of our country and the interests of overseas investors. This article includes the introduction, the text, the conclusion three parts, the body altogether four chapters. Chapter 1, the evolution and characteristics of amicus curiae system. Firstly, it analyzes the development and innovation of amicus curiae system in judicial practice; secondly, on the basis of the evolution of amicus curiae system, it summarizes and generalizes it. The characteristics of its system. Chapter 2 analyzes the value of amicus curiae system to investor-state dispute arbitration. This chapter is divided into two parts: the first part introduces the general legal value of amicus curiae system to all the dispute settlement procedures, the second part expounds the concrete embodiment of the above legal value in the investor-state dispute arbitration. In chapter 3, this chapter introduces the practice and achievements of amicus curiae system in the field of investor and state dispute settlement, and analyzes the existing problems and improvement countermeasures. Chapter 4, the attitude and suggestion of introducing amicus curiae in investor-state dispute arbitration. This chapter first analyzes the attitude of introducing amicus curiae into the system, and then puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with this change.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】