鹿特丹规则下货物控制权的理论辨析与应用

发布时间：2018-06-15 08:29

本文选题：鹿特丹规则 + 货物控制权　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：鹿特丹规则创设的货物控制权制度对于海上货物运输具有极大的影响,控制权立法从一个新的角度阐释了海上货物权利的归属与行使规则。本文在导言中说明了认识控制权的意义,并确定以权利的性质和适用分析作为本文的写作重点。第一章中将首先从概念入手介绍公约对货物控制权内容的规定,明确其权利外观上为一种单方指示,然后结合中途停运权和货物控制权的关系介绍控制权发展历程与其背后贸易法与运输法的衔接要求。第二章主要分析争议较多的权利性质问题,改变以往仅以某一方面特征进行货物控制权性质探究的方式,由该权利产生的背景,抓住支配这一物权的核心理念,阐述货物控制权为物权性质,并从海运环境的特殊性解释其和所有权的关系。第三章主要分析FOB贸易术语下,货物卖方如何通过成为控制方解决以往难于解决的权利主体地位问题,说明控制权主体识别模式的革新,即不再以托运人为核心而是确定单独唯一的控制方为权利主体。第四章将分析在公约制度背景下控制权的适用,鹿特丹规则把货物控制权作为指示交付的基础,分别规定各种单证条件下的放货方式,从而将无单放货和它暗含的提单法则作为货物交付的一个环节问题加以解决。总结部分将说明鹿特丹规则以及货物控制权制度的创新精神和示范法意义,
[Abstract]:The system of right of control of goods created by Rotterdam rules has great influence on the carriage of goods by sea. The legislation of right of control explains the rules of attribution and exercise of rights of goods by sea from a new angle. In the introduction, this paper explains the significance of understanding the right of control, and determines that the analysis of the nature and applicability of the right is the focus of this paper. The first chapter will introduce the content of the control of goods from the concept of the provisions of the Convention, and make it clear that the appearance of its rights is a unilateral direction. Then the relationship between the right of stoppage and the right of control of goods is combined to introduce the course of the development of the right of control and the connection requirement between the trade law and the law of transport behind it. The second chapter mainly analyzes the controversial nature of the right to change the past only with a certain aspect of the nature of control of goods to explore the nature of the way by the right to the background of the right to seize the ruling of the core concept of the real right. This paper expounds that the right of control of goods is real right, and explains its relation with ownership from the particularity of maritime environment. The third chapter mainly analyzes how the seller of goods solves the problem of the status of the rights subject which was difficult to solve in the past by becoming the controlling party under the FOB trade term, and explains the innovation of the identification pattern of the subject of control. That is to say, the shipper is no longer the core, but the sole controlling party as the subject of the right. Chapter IV will analyze the application of the right of control in the context of the Convention regime. The Rotterdam rules take the right of control of the goods as the basis for the indicated delivery, respectively, and specify the mode of delivery under various documentary conditions. The undocumented delivery of goods and its implied bill of lading law as a link in the delivery of goods to be resolved. The concluding part will explain the innovative spirit of the Rotterdam rules and the regime of control over goods and the implications of the Model Law,
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.19

【引证文献】