论跨国破产中的管辖权问题

发布时间：2018-06-16 06:31

本文选题：跨国破产 + 管辖权冲突　；参考：《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：跨国破产管辖权的确定是解决跨国破产问题的前提和基础,它影响到实体法的选择和判决的承认与执行,直接关系到当事人的切身利益。跨国破产案件的复杂性、各国国内立法的差异、司法主权的争夺、平行管辖权的采用以及利益冲突是产生管辖权冲突的原因。跨国破产管辖权的一般标准分为以属地管辖为基础的管辖权标准、以属人管辖为基础的管辖权标准和以协议管辖为基础的管辖权标准。“先受理原则”和“不方便法院原则”作为传统的解决国际民商事管辖权冲突的原则,可以用来解决跨国破产管辖权冲突。国际合作对于管辖权冲突的解决也十分重要,国家间的相互妥协和高效合作可以减少和避免管辖权冲突。国际上主要有三种跨国破产管辖权冲突的解决模式:《美国统一联邦破产法》中的管辖权冲突解决模式、《欧盟破产程序规则》中的管辖权冲突解决模式和联合国《跨国破产示范法》中的管辖权冲突解决模式。国内立法对跨国破产管辖权进行自我限制、制定全球性的跨国破产统一法、签订国家间的双边或多边条约以及个案直接协商是解决管辖权冲突的具体途径。分析我国司法实践中的跨国破产案例,发现我国有关跨国破产管辖权的立法依旧空白,相关法律的缺失给司法实践带来了困扰。为解决该难题,文章提出在立法上对跨国破产进行集中管辖、借鉴主次破产程序中管辖权标准的建议。
[Abstract]:The determination of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is the premise and foundation of solving the transnational bankruptcy problem. It affects the choice of substantive law and the recognition and enforcement of judgment, and directly relates to the vital interests of the parties concerned. The complexity of transnational bankruptcy cases, the differences of domestic legislation, the contention of judicial sovereignty, the adoption of parallel jurisdiction and the conflict of interests are the causes of jurisdiction conflicts. The general criterion of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is divided into jurisdiction standard based on territorial jurisdiction, jurisdiction standard based on personal jurisdiction and jurisdiction standard based on agreement jurisdiction. As the traditional principle of resolving conflicts of jurisdiction in international civil and commercial affairs, the principle of first admissibility and the principle of inconvenient courts can be used to solve the conflicts of jurisdiction in transnational bankruptcy. International cooperation is also very important for the resolution of jurisdiction conflicts. Mutual compromise and efficient cooperation among countries can reduce and avoid conflicts of jurisdiction. There are mainly three kinds of conflict resolution models of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in the world: the conflict of jurisdiction model in the United federal bankruptcy law of the United states of America, the conflict of jurisdiction model in the rules of bankruptcy procedure of the European union and the United nations The Model Law on Transnational Insolvency (MLCBI): a Model for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction. Domestic legislation limits transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction, formulates global uniform law of transnational bankruptcy, signs bilateral or multilateral treaties between countries and direct negotiation of individual cases is the concrete way to resolve jurisdiction conflicts. By analyzing the cases of transnational bankruptcy in the judicial practice of our country, it is found that the legislation on transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is still blank, and the lack of relevant laws has troubled the judicial practice. In order to solve this problem, this paper puts forward the suggestion of centralized jurisdiction over transnational bankruptcy in legislation and drawing lessons from the jurisdiction standard in primary and secondary bankruptcy proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996

【引证文献】