贸易救济中的双重救济:中美特定产品双反案评析

发布时间：2018-06-16 06:57

本文选题：反倾销税 + 反补贴税　；参考：《华东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年04期

【摘要】：2011年3月25日,世界贸易组织争端解决机构通过了"美国对来自中国的特定产品征收反倾销税和反补贴税案"的上诉机构报告和经上诉机构报告修订的专家组报告,认定"美国针对四种中国产品同时征收以非市场经济方法计算出来的反倾销税和反补贴税的做法,即所谓的双重救济构成对同一补贴的双重抵消,因此违反《补贴与反补贴措施协定》第19条第3款的规定"。至此,历经两年之久的中美特定产品双反案告一段落。在本案审理中,中美双方争论的焦点之一是贸易救济中的双重救济问题,即美国针对来自中国的同一产品同时征收以非市场经济方法计算出来的反倾销税和反补贴税的做法,而本文将主要针对此项争议就争端双方的主张以及专家组和上诉机构的裁定内容做一评析。
[Abstract]:On 25 March 2011, the dispute settlement body of the World Trade Organization adopted the report of the Appellate body on the case concerning Anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties imposed by the United States on certain products from China and the report of the Panel of experts as amended by the report of the Appellate body, Determining that "the United States has simultaneously imposed anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties on four kinds of Chinese products, which are calculated by non-market economy methods, that is, the so-called double relief constitutes a double offset to the same subsidy," Thus violating the provisions of article 19, paragraph 3, of the Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures ". At this point, after two years of specific products in China and the United States to the end of the double-counter case. In the trial of this case, one of the focuses of the dispute between China and the United States is the issue of dual relief in trade relief, that is, the United States collects anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties on the same product from China at the same time, which are calculated by the method of non-market economy. This paper will mainly comment on the claims of the parties to the dispute and the ruling of the panel and the appellate body.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：2008年度浙江省“钱江人才计划”一般项目“入世后中国的国际贸易争端研究” 国家“211工程”三期重点学科建设项目“转型期法治的理论、制度与实证研究”的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】