论CISG在香港的适用

发布时间：2018-06-29 20:13

本文选题：《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》 + 条约适用　；参考：《湘潭大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：基于香港特殊的法律地位，《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》在香港适用的情况一直没有明文规定。在国际司法实践中，有的国家承认《公约》适用于香港地区，有的国家则否认《公约》适用于香港地区。国际司法实践中有许多有关《公约》在香港适用的案例，其中最具代表性的两个案例，一个是美国CNA公司诉科龙国际（香港）案，一个是法国的电信产品案。从这两个案例判决理由中可以看出，美国法院认为在对待涉及香港当事人的案件中应适用《公约》的规定，而法国法院则持相反的观点。事实上，《公约》在香港适用不明的问题由来已久，主要是由于历史原因造成的。1997年之前，由于英国并不是《公约》的缔约方，，所以当时在英国统治之下的香港自然也是不能适用《公约》的，但是香港回归后中国政府也并未按照《公约》规定做出声明，声明《公约》是否适用于香港地区，自此，《公约》在香港适用的问题便不甚明确，于是从而造成了各国在司法实践中在此问题上态度不一。在香港能否适用《公约》的问题上，学界争论不一。从当前的实际来看，不论我国是否根据公约第93条第（1）款做出声明与否，香港应当是可以适用《公约》的。其主要依据如下：第一，香港是中国领土不可分割的一部分，中国对香港的主权不可争辩；第二，根据《公约》第93条第（1）款的规定，香港完全符合公约第93条中关于领土单位的定义，而且《公约》第93条做出声明针对的是一国不希望《公约》适用于其全部领土单位的情况，既然我国未做出任何关于《公约》是否适用于香港的声明，而香港又符合《公约》中关于领土单位的定义，那么《公约》自然应当是适用于香港地区的。《公约》要在香港适用主要有以下两个问题，一个是适用的方式，另一个是《公约》保留在香港的效力。目前，《公约》在香港的适用只能通过转化适用的方式进行。具体适用中可以分为两类：一是在涉及香港当事人和内地当事人案件的适用，二是在涉及香港当事人和外国当事人案件中的适用。至于《公约》的保留在香港的效力问题，应当结合中国政府在过渡时期处理国际条约保留问题的三原则进行具体问题具体分析，在结合三原则进行分析的情况下，可以看出，若《公约》在香港适用，我国有关《公约》做出的保留无须适用于香港地区。
[Abstract]:Due to the special legal status of Hong Kong, the UN Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods has not been expressly stipulated in Hong Kong. In international judicial practice, some countries recognize that the Convention is applicable to Hong Kong, while others deny that it is applicable to Hong Kong. There are many cases concerning the application of the Convention in Hong Kong in international judicial practice, one of which is the most representative case, one is the case of CNA v. Cologne International (Hong Kong), the other is the case of telecommunications products in France. As can be seen from the reasons for these two cases, the United States courts held that the provisions of the Convention should be applied in cases involving Hong Kong parties, while the French courts held the opposite view. In fact, the problem of the application of the Convention in Hong Kong has been unknown for a long time, mainly for historical reasons. Before 1997, since the United Kingdom was not a party to the Convention, Therefore, Hong Kong, which was under British rule at that time, was naturally unable to apply the Convention. However, after the reunification of Hong Kong, the Chinese Government did not make a declaration in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, declaring whether the Convention would apply to the Hong Kong region. Since then, the application of the Convention in Hong Kong is not very clear, thus resulting in different countries in judicial practice on this issue. There is disagreement among academics about whether Hong Kong can apply the Convention. In current practice, Hong Kong should be able to apply the Convention whether or not it has made the declaration under Article 93 (1) of the Convention. The main reasons are as follows: first, Hong Kong is an inalienable part of Chinese territory and China's sovereignty over Hong Kong is indisputable; second, in accordance with article 93 (1) of the Covenant, "Hong Kong is in full compliance with the definition of territorial unit in article 93 of the Convention, and that article 93 of the Convention makes the declaration that a State does not wish the Convention to apply to all its territorial units," Since China has not made any declaration as to the applicability of the Convention to Hong Kong, and Hong Kong meets the definition of territorial unit in the Convention, Then, naturally, the Convention should be applicable to Hong Kong. There are two main problems in the application of the Convention in Hong Kong, one is the mode of application and the other is the effect of reservations to the Convention in Hong Kong. At present, the application of the Convention in Hong Kong can only be carried out by means of conversion. The concrete application can be divided into two categories: one is the application in cases involving Hong Kong parties and the mainland parties, and the other is the application in cases involving Hong Kong parties and foreign parties. As for the question of the validity of reservations to the Convention in Hong Kong, we should conduct a specific analysis in the light of the three principles of the Chinese Government dealing with reservations to international treaties during the transitional period. In the light of the analysis of the three principles, it can be seen that If the Convention applies in Hong Kong, the reservations made by China to the Convention need not apply to the Hong Kong region.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】