非内国仲裁裁决在我国承认与执行的实证分析

发布时间：2018-07-05 10:49

本文选题：国际商事仲裁 + 非内国仲裁裁决　；参考：《山西大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着中国经济发展,中国与国际间的贸易往来越来越密切,在此过程中,出现越来越多的贸易纠纷,并有逐年上升的趋势。然而,若在争议双方的其中一国参与诉讼,除了有国家地域保护的担忧之外,还伴随着昂贵的诉讼成本,冗长的诉讼程序,及不熟悉当地法律等不利因素存在。因而,更多的人们开始选择国际仲裁这一相对快捷的方式。国际仲裁也成为解决商事争议的一个重要途径。关于国际商事仲裁在一国内的承认与执行,其主要依据是1958年《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(《纽约公约》),我国在1987年加入该公约,并对其中一些条款作出保留。大量案例表明,我国在司法实践中很好的实现了我国加入该公约时的初衷和承诺。但是我国在承认和执行的过程中,由于保留声明,对于在我国境内做出的、但依照我国法律又不认为是我国仲裁裁决的非内国仲裁裁决没有规定,相关立法存在一定的缺陷。除此之外,我国在司法实践中,对于如何确定仲裁裁决的国籍存在不少的模糊之处。由此,在之前出现的承认和执行非内国仲裁裁决的案例中,出现了不少充满争议之处。学界和实务界对于如何认定、怎么认定、认定之后是否应该予以承认和执行都有很大争议。在本文中,针对在实践中出现的各式问题,希望能够通过典型案例,经深入分析得出我国目前存在的缺陷、问题,并结合我国的立法及实践现状,提出相应的解决对策。以求既能解决相关问题,又能够保有我国的司法主权。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's economy, the trade between China and the world is getting closer and closer. In the process, more and more trade disputes appear, and the trend is rising year by year. However, if one of the parties to the dispute is involved in litigation, there are also disadvantages such as high litigation costs, lengthy proceedings, and lack of familiarity with local law, in addition to national territorial protection concerns. As a result, more people began to choose international arbitration as a relatively fast way. International arbitration has also become an important way to settle commercial disputes. With regard to the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration in one country, the main basis is the 1958 Convention on the recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention). China acceded to the Convention in 1987 and made reservations to some of its provisions. A large number of cases show that the original intention and promise of China's accession to the Convention have been well realized in judicial practice. However, in the process of recognition and enforcement, due to the reservation of the declaration, there are some defects in the relevant legislation for the non-domestic arbitration award which is made in our country, but which is not considered to be an arbitral award in our country according to the law of our country. In addition, in our judicial practice, there are many ambiguities about how to determine the nationality of arbitration award. Therefore, there are many disputes in the previous cases of recognition and enforcement of non-domestic arbitral awards. Academic and practical circles have a lot of controversy about how to identify, whether to recognize and enforce after the confirmation. In this paper, in view of the various kinds of problems in practice, I hope that through the typical cases, through in-depth analysis of the defects and problems existing in our country, and combined with the legislation and practice of the status quo, put forward the corresponding solutions. In order to solve the relevant problems, but also to retain our judicial sovereignty.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】