跨国公司知识产权滥用的反垄断法规制若干问题研究
[Abstract]:As we all know, intellectual property is very important to the development of enterprises, the growth of national economy and the progress of human civilization. The competition of intellectual property between enterprises has been in a very fierce state. Among them, multinational companies often have important intellectual property rights in their industries, and have advantages or even dominant positions in relevant markets. Even its ability to grow and become an industry giant, intellectual property rights play a very key role. The development of Microsoft, for example, is closely related to its proprietary technology and intellectual property rights such as copyright. In addition, it is worth noting that in recent years, the tide of enterprise M & A and even cross-border M & A has surged. The merger will further enhance the market dominance of multinational companies and their ability to control or deploy intellectual property rights. In the United States in particular, the government gave the green light to a series of giant mergers. After the global financial crisis broke out in 2007, the multinational enterprises pay more attention to developing or integrating into the global value chain through the establishment of non-equity management model except for direct investment and trade. Non-equity management mode is essentially a form of contract-protected transfer of intellectual property to local non-equity partners. The cases of multinational corporations abusing intellectual property rights to maximize their profits by using their dominant position in the market occur frequently. The best-known case is the Federal Department of Justice and the Justice Department of 20 States of the United States v. Microsoft. It can be said that the intangibility of intellectual property rights obscures the proper boundary of rights, and exclusive grant to the obligee the convenience of exceeding the moment. The profit-driven enterprises set the maximization of profits as the ultimate goal and make use of their dominant position in the market to gain for themselves without regard to the institutional significance of promoting innovation and benefiting the society by intellectual property. Abuse of rights can no longer be a guarantee to promote social welfare, on the contrary, alienation will become a means to restrict reasonable competition and consolidate monopoly position. At this time, it is a difficult and necessary mission to discuss the anti-monopoly law rules to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The first part of this paper will discuss the current situation of transnational corporations' intellectual property abuse and the theoretical basis of anti-monopoly regulation. The second and third parts will discuss the anti-monopoly law rules and practices of developed countries (US) or regions (EU) on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations, and the fourth part will discuss the international anti-monopoly rules on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The fifth part will focus on the current situation of anti-monopoly law and practice of the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations in China, and put forward the corresponding suggestions on how to perfect the law and how to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of domestic enterprises to limit competition behavior.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D922.294;D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈涛;;对跨国公司知识产权滥用的法律规制——从思科诉华为案谈起[J];中华商标;2009年01期
2 江清云;单晓光;;欧美知识产权领域中的反垄断诉讼及其经济分析[J];比较法研究;2008年02期
3 余东华;;价格歧视、经销商串货与反垄断分析——以“诺基亚事件”为例[J];财贸经济;2010年04期
4 陈玮;;知识产权滥用的反垄断规制[J];东南学术;2005年06期
5 乔生;中国限制外国企业对知识产权滥用的立法思考[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年01期
6 高兰英;;在华跨国公司滥用知识产权的反垄断法规制问题研究[J];湖南社会科学;2011年02期
7 路伟;;从华为-思科案看知识产权战略[J];法人杂志;2006年10期
8 郑友德;胡章怡;;欧盟知识产权滥用的反垄断问题研究——以欧盟新修订的《技术许可协议集体豁免条例》为中心[J];法学评论;2006年06期
9 王海燕;;迫在眉睫:知识产权的战略性威胁——思科诉讼华为案的启示[J];广东科技;2007年05期
10 刘宇;;后TRIPS时代知识产权滥用行为的反垄断规制[J];广东科技;2010年14期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 沈菁;知识产权的反垄断法律规制[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 黄霞;跨国公司知识产权滥用的反垄断法规制研究[D];华东政法大学;2007年
3 刘丽;国际技术贸易中限制性商业做法及其法律规制[D];西南政法大学;2007年
4 高晓瑞;跨国公司在华投资中与知识产权有关的若干法律问题研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
5 李斌;跨国公司专利权滥用的法律规制[D];西南政法大学;2010年
本文编号:2178054
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2178054.html