国际商事仲裁中禁诉令制度研究
发布时间：2018-09-02 05:49
【摘要】：国际商事仲裁和国际民事诉讼是现代社会解决国际商事纠纷的最常见的两种手段,但当事人己不再局限于“二选一”的模式选择救济方式。合同一方依仲裁条款就争议提交仲裁,但对方当事人依旧向外国或本国法院就该合同纠纷提起诉讼,进而形成了与平行诉讼相类似的平行程序。而作为解决平行诉讼问题的禁诉令制度就顺势被引入,支持仲裁的一方当事人可以向本国或者外国法院申请发布禁诉令,以阻止对方当事人在法院提起诉讼,用以调和此类平行程序所产生的矛盾。本文着重讨论的就是上述禁诉令制度,通过对禁诉令的实证分析,从案例出发,就禁诉令的理论基础、发布标准等,对仲裁中的禁诉令制度做一个较为全面的剖析,并在此基础上提出笔者的论点——在当前的状况下,我国在立法中不应将此制度原则化,而是通过司法解释的模式,着重解决应对外国禁诉令的问题。
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration and international civil action are the two most common means to solve international commercial disputes in modern society, but the parties are no longer confined to the mode of "choosing one from two". One party to the contract submitted the dispute to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause, but the other party still filed a lawsuit against the contract dispute in foreign or domestic courts, thus forming parallel proceedings similar to parallel proceedings. The injunction system, which solves the problem of parallel litigation, has been introduced. A party who supports arbitration can apply to a local or foreign court for an injunction to prevent the other party from filing a lawsuit in the court. Used to reconcile contradictions arising from such parallel procedures. This paper focuses on the above injunction system, through the empirical analysis of the injunction, starting from the case, on the theoretical basis of the injunction, issuing standards and so on, to make a more comprehensive analysis of the injunction system in arbitration. On the basis of this, the author points out that under the current situation, China should not make this system principled in its legislation, but focus on solving the problem of dealing with foreign injunctions through the mode of judicial interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration and international civil action are the two most common means to solve international commercial disputes in modern society, but the parties are no longer confined to the mode of "choosing one from two". One party to the contract submitted the dispute to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause, but the other party still filed a lawsuit against the contract dispute in foreign or domestic courts, thus forming parallel proceedings similar to parallel proceedings. The injunction system, which solves the problem of parallel litigation, has been introduced. A party who supports arbitration can apply to a local or foreign court for an injunction to prevent the other party from filing a lawsuit in the court. Used to reconcile contradictions arising from such parallel procedures. This paper focuses on the above injunction system, through the empirical analysis of the injunction, starting from the case, on the theoretical basis of the injunction, issuing standards and so on, to make a more comprehensive analysis of the injunction system in arbitration. On the basis of this, the author points out that under the current situation, China should not make this system principled in its legislation, but focus on solving the problem of dealing with foreign injunctions through the mode of judicial interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑文豪;;浅议国际商事仲裁第三人制度[J];经济视角(中旬);2011年05期
2 茹艳爽;;国际商事仲裁第三人制度研究[J];学理论;2011年21期
3 王艳梅;;浅谈国际商事仲裁第三人[J];知识经济;2011年16期
4 张敏;;论国际商事仲裁中的临时保全措施[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2011年02期
5 姚婷;;国际商事仲裁中的公共政策问题[J];学理论;2011年20期
6 王吉文;;海牙《选择法院协议公约》对国际商事仲裁的影响[J];仲裁研究;2011年01期
7 肖平容;;论外国商事仲裁裁决司法审查的适度性[J];仲裁研究;2011年01期
8 杨月萍;;论国际商事仲裁中争议事项可仲裁性的法律适用[J];温州大学学报(自然科学版);2011年03期
9 钟鼎文;;论国际商事仲裁中临时性保全措施之执行[J];仲裁研究;2011年02期
10 赵东婧;董程;李Pr琦;;国际商事仲裁裁决后执行情况问题探究[J];商场现代化;2011年16期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 崔起凡;;国际商事仲裁域外取证的司法协助:现状与趋势[A];中国仲裁与司法论坛暨2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
2 崔起凡;;论国际商事仲裁中的独立专家证人——以《国际仲裁取证规则》为中心[A];中国仲裁与司法论坛暨2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
3 王s，
本文编号：2218447
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2218447.html
