我国海外投资之间接征收风险及对策——基于“平安公司—富通集团案”的解读

发布时间：2018-10-09 09:00

【摘要】：目前我国在海外的投资需求日益增多、投资条件日渐成熟,加之我国政府出台了一系列鼓励海外投资的政策和措施,对推动我国投资者去海外"抄底"产生了巨大的协同效应。然而在全球金融危机的背景下,东道国包括传统上通常被认为是投资环境较稳定的发达国家,频频以保护公共利益为由采取一些非常态的国家管制措施,其中部分措施已经对外国投资产生了间接征收的效果。双边投资协定作为解决双边投资争端的法律依据将极大地影响争端解决的结果。我国在制订或修订双边投资协定时,应当增加双边投资协定的选择性和具体导向性,完善间接征收的定义、认定标准以及投资争端解决机制的规定。
[Abstract]:At present, our country's overseas investment demand is increasing day by day, the investment condition is maturing day by day, in addition our country government has issued a series of policies and measures to encourage overseas investment, has produced the huge synergistic effect to the promotion our country investor to "copy the bottom" overseas. However, in the context of the global financial crisis, host countries, including developed countries that have traditionally been considered to be more stable in the investment climate, frequently take some unusual national regulatory measures to protect the public interest. Some of these measures have had an indirect effect on foreign investment. As the legal basis for settling bilateral investment disputes, bilateral investment agreements (bits) will greatly affect the outcome of dispute settlement. In formulating or revising bilateral investment agreements, China should increase the selectivity and specific orientation of bilateral investment agreements, perfect the definition of indirect expropriation, identify standards and the provisions of investment dispute settlement mechanism.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】