民间对日索赔的国际刑法依据

发布时间：2018-12-06 14:48

【摘要】：笔者有感于我国民间对日索赔诉讼受到重重障碍的现状,结合民间对日索赔问题产生的历史背景及遭遇的法律障碍,以国际刑法的相关内容作支撑,运用国际人道法、国际刑法、国际法等相关知识进行分析,为中国民间对日索赔找到相关法律依据。并结合当前国情,对实现民间对日索赔权提出了具有创新性的解决思路及建议。本文突破了以往法学界在对日索赔研究中以国际法及民法作为理论依据的思维局限,将国际刑法的相关理论与对日索赔实践相结合进行研究,从选题本身就极具突破性。对对日索赔权的权利属性及来源进行了创新性的解读,在国家刑事责任等内容的阐述上亦达到一定的突破。从现实层面来说,本文着眼于现实问题,结合相关历史背景与发展现状,对日本法院通常采用的判决理由进行深入分析和反驳,扫除对日诉讼的法律障碍。为对日诉讼提供更多的法律依据和多层面的解读与支持,对正在进行中的索赔实践和索赔诉讼的进一步深化拓展有着重大的现实意义。
[Abstract]:The author feels that the current situation of our country's folk claim litigation against Japan has been obstructed, combined with the historical background and the legal obstacles encountered by the folk claims against Japan, supported by the relevant contents of international criminal law, the author applies international humanitarian law. International criminal law, international law and other relevant knowledge of the analysis for Chinese folk claims against Japan to find the relevant legal basis. Combined with the current situation, this paper puts forward some innovative ideas and suggestions to realize the civil claim right against Japan. This paper breaks through the thinking limitation that the legal circles used international law and civil law as the theoretical basis in the study of Japanese claims in the past, and combines the relevant theories of international criminal law with the practice of claims against Japan, which is a breakthrough from the topic itself. This paper makes an innovative interpretation of the right attribute and source of Japanese claim right, and achieves a certain breakthrough in the elaboration of the content of national criminal responsibility. From the perspective of reality, this paper focuses on the practical problems, combines the relevant historical background and the present development situation, deeply analyzes and refutes the judgment reasons commonly used by Japanese courts, and removes the legal obstacles to the Japanese litigation. In order to provide more legal basis and multi-level interpretation and support for Japanese litigation, it is of great practical significance to the practice of claims in progress and the further development of claim litigation.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.9

【共引文献】