国际商事仲裁平行程序研究
发布时间:2018-12-19 19:53
【摘要】:随着社会生产力的进一步解放,生产分工精细化,我国进入了经济体制的转型期。转型期矛盾冲突加剧,社会分层明显,人们之间的矛盾冲突也随之显现出来。国际商事仲裁作为解决国际商事争议的一种重要方式,对于我国的纠纷解决资源的优化配置,具有特殊意义,己被国际社会普遍认可。 本文主要针对国际商事仲裁在解决纠纷的过程中,遇到的平行程序问题进行研究。本文总共分为四个大部分:第一部分是国际商事仲裁中平行程序概述;第二部分是解决国际商事仲裁中平行程序的途径——自裁管辖;第三部分是解决国际商事仲裁中平行程序的途径——一事不再理;最后一部分是解决国际商事仲裁中平行程序的途径——合并仲裁。 文章的第一部分,主要从以下几个方面进行论述:首先,阐述了平行程序的概念;然后,阐述了平行程序的表现形式;接着,阐述了国际商事仲裁平行程序产生的原因;最后,列举了它的弊端。 文章的第二部分,主要从以下几个方面进行论述:首先,阐述了自裁管辖原则的含义;然后,论述了自裁管辖原则的理念;最后,论述了笔者对我国构建自裁管辖制度的一些建议。 文章的第三部分,主要从一下几个方面进行论述:首先,阐述了一事不再理原则的含义;然后,论述了该原则的理论理念;接着,论述了该原则在国际商事仲裁中的应用及评价;最后,论述了笔者对我国构建一事不再理制度的一些建议。 文章的第四部分,也是最后一部分,主要从以下几个方面进行论述:首先,阐述了合并仲裁制度的含义;然后,论述了该制度的理论理念;接着,论述了该制度在国际商事仲裁平行程序中的应用及评价;最后,论述了笔者对我国构建这一制度的一些建议。
[Abstract]:With the further emancipation of social productive forces and the fine division of labor, China has entered the transition period of economic system. Contradictions and conflicts in the transition period intensify, social stratification is obvious, contradictions and conflicts between people also appear. As an important way to settle international commercial disputes, international commercial arbitration has a special significance for the optimal allocation of dispute settlement resources in China, and has been generally recognized by the international community. This paper focuses on the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration in the process of dispute settlement. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration, the second part is the way to solve the parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration-self-adjudication jurisdiction; The third part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration, and the last part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration-merger arbitration. The first part of the article mainly discusses the following aspects: firstly, the concept of parallel procedure; then, the manifestation of parallel procedure; then, the causes of parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration; Finally, its disadvantages are listed. The second part of the article, mainly from the following aspects: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction, and then discussed the concept of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction; Finally, the author discusses some suggestions on the establishment of self-adjudication jurisdiction system in China. The third part of the article, mainly from the following several aspects to discuss: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of non bis in idem; Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the principle in international commercial arbitration. The fourth part and the last part of the article mainly discuss the following aspects: first, the meaning of the merger arbitration system, and then, the theoretical concept of the system is discussed. Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the system in the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration, and finally, discusses some suggestions on the construction of this system in our country.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D997.4
本文编号:2387373
[Abstract]:With the further emancipation of social productive forces and the fine division of labor, China has entered the transition period of economic system. Contradictions and conflicts in the transition period intensify, social stratification is obvious, contradictions and conflicts between people also appear. As an important way to settle international commercial disputes, international commercial arbitration has a special significance for the optimal allocation of dispute settlement resources in China, and has been generally recognized by the international community. This paper focuses on the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration in the process of dispute settlement. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration, the second part is the way to solve the parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration-self-adjudication jurisdiction; The third part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration, and the last part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration-merger arbitration. The first part of the article mainly discusses the following aspects: firstly, the concept of parallel procedure; then, the manifestation of parallel procedure; then, the causes of parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration; Finally, its disadvantages are listed. The second part of the article, mainly from the following aspects: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction, and then discussed the concept of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction; Finally, the author discusses some suggestions on the establishment of self-adjudication jurisdiction system in China. The third part of the article, mainly from the following several aspects to discuss: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of non bis in idem; Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the principle in international commercial arbitration. The fourth part and the last part of the article mainly discuss the following aspects: first, the meaning of the merger arbitration system, and then, the theoretical concept of the system is discussed. Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the system in the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration, and finally, discusses some suggestions on the construction of this system in our country.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周清华;;论平行仲裁解决机制[J];法学杂志;2007年03期
2 周清华;任宪龙;;“默示意思自治”解析[J];法学杂志;2008年06期
3 宁敏,宋连斌;评国际商事仲裁中的管辖权原则[J];法学评论;2000年02期
4 朱克鹏;论国际商事仲裁中的法院干预[J];法学评论;1995年04期
5 王斐弘;修改《仲裁法》论纲——以理念、基本原则和具体制度为框架的建构[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2004年01期
6 周清华;;合并仲裁的理性分析[J];江西社会科学;2008年03期
7 周清华;李海跃;;以仲裁的价值取向为视角解析CIETAC 2005年仲裁规则[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
8 李莉;合并仲裁及其相关问题[J];求是学刊;2000年05期
9 高雅;试论国际商事仲裁协议的效力认定主体——兼评中国的立法与实践[J];求实;2005年S2期
10 李川;合并仲裁的利弊与规制[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 丁小军;国际商事仲裁管辖权异议研究[D];武汉大学;2004年
2 王研君;国际商事仲裁自裁管辖权问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2009年
,本文编号:2387373
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2387373.html