论国际商事仲裁中的公共政策
发布时间：2019-02-22 11:52
【摘要】：公共政策是一个非常复杂、模糊且广泛的概念,在不同的学科中有着不同的含义和解释。国际商事仲裁中的公共政策体现的是特定国家在特定时期、特定问题上的根本利益,是各国为保护基本的政治、经济、法律制度和道德观念的“安全阀”。然而各国的国情不同,对最基本原则和利益的认识不一致,各国立法和国际公约也都未对公共政策作出明确的解释和界定,导致在公共政策具体适用中出现差异。国际商事仲裁制度的基础在于当事人意思自治,而公共政策一定程度上抑制这种自治性。研究国际商事仲裁中的公共政策,不论是对本国根本利益的保护,还是对更好的构建商事仲裁价值体系都是有意义的。 公共政策在国际商事仲裁领域的适用是非常广泛的,本文从可仲裁性、仲裁法律适用、承认和执行国际商事仲裁裁决三方面详细论述公共政策的适用。可仲裁性方面主要研究公共政策在反垄断争议、知识产权侵权争议、商业贿赂合同争议的适用,反映目前可仲裁性事项范围的不断扩大,公共政策也逐渐放开对其的限制。根据欧美国家最近的实践和立法表明,公共政策和可仲裁性的关系正逐步呈现出相脱离的趋势。仲裁法律适用方面主要从公共政策对仲裁协议法律适用、仲裁程序法律适用、仲裁实体法律适用的限制展开论述。公共政策在承认与执行商事仲裁裁决领域的运用是最广泛的,本文从《纽约公约》和《示范法》入手,再到《关于以公共政策为由拒绝执行国际仲裁裁决的最终报告》,分析公共政策适用的限制,有助于更加准确的援引公共政策。 中国国内立法和司法实践中都有公共政策的体现,但是与其他仲裁走在前列的国家和地区相比,关于公共政策立法表达不一致、可仲裁性限制较多等方面表明仍存在需要改进的地方,立法的缺陷将对司法实践带来一定的负面影响。本文分别从可仲裁性、仲裁法律适用、承认和执行国际商事仲裁裁决三方面分析公共政策在中国适用的现状,并提出了进一步的参考意见。
[Abstract]:Public policy is a very complex, vague and broad concept with different meanings and interpretations in different disciplines. The public policy in international commercial arbitration embodies the fundamental interests of a particular country in a specific period and a particular issue, and is a "safety valve" for countries to protect their basic political, economic, legal system and moral concepts. However, the national conditions of different countries, the most basic principles and interests of the understanding is inconsistent, national legislation and international conventions have not made a clear interpretation and definition of public policy, leading to differences in the specific application of public policy. The basis of international commercial arbitration system is party autonomy, which is restrained to some extent by public policy. It is meaningful to study the public policy in international commercial arbitration, not only to protect the fundamental interests of our country, but also to construct a better value system of commercial arbitration. The application of public policy in the field of international commercial arbitration is very extensive. This paper discusses the application of public policy in detail from three aspects: arbitrability, application of arbitration law and recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards. In the aspect of arbitrability, the application of public policy in antitrust disputes, intellectual property rights infringement disputes and commercial bribery contract disputes is mainly studied, which reflects the expanding scope of arbitrability matters and the gradual liberalization of public policy restrictions on them. According to the recent practice and legislation in Europe and America, the relationship between public policy and arbitrability is gradually showing a trend of separation. The application of arbitration law is mainly discussed from the public policy on the application of the law of arbitration agreement, the application of law of arbitration procedure and the limitation of the application of law of arbitration entity. The application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of commercial arbitral awards is the most extensive. This paper starts with the New York Convention and the Model Law, and then to the final report on refusal to enforce International Arbitral Awards on the grounds of Public Policy. Analysis of the limitations of public policy application will help to invoke public policy more accurately. China's domestic legislation and judicial practice both reflect public policy, but compared with other countries and regions where arbitration is at the forefront, the expression of public policy legislation is inconsistent. The limitation of arbitrability indicates that there are still some problems to be improved, and the defects of the legislation will bring some negative effects to the judicial practice. This paper analyzes the current situation of the application of public policy in China from the aspects of arbitrability, application of arbitration law, recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards, and puts forward further suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4
本文编号：2428196
[Abstract]:Public policy is a very complex, vague and broad concept with different meanings and interpretations in different disciplines. The public policy in international commercial arbitration embodies the fundamental interests of a particular country in a specific period and a particular issue, and is a "safety valve" for countries to protect their basic political, economic, legal system and moral concepts. However, the national conditions of different countries, the most basic principles and interests of the understanding is inconsistent, national legislation and international conventions have not made a clear interpretation and definition of public policy, leading to differences in the specific application of public policy. The basis of international commercial arbitration system is party autonomy, which is restrained to some extent by public policy. It is meaningful to study the public policy in international commercial arbitration, not only to protect the fundamental interests of our country, but also to construct a better value system of commercial arbitration. The application of public policy in the field of international commercial arbitration is very extensive. This paper discusses the application of public policy in detail from three aspects: arbitrability, application of arbitration law and recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards. In the aspect of arbitrability, the application of public policy in antitrust disputes, intellectual property rights infringement disputes and commercial bribery contract disputes is mainly studied, which reflects the expanding scope of arbitrability matters and the gradual liberalization of public policy restrictions on them. According to the recent practice and legislation in Europe and America, the relationship between public policy and arbitrability is gradually showing a trend of separation. The application of arbitration law is mainly discussed from the public policy on the application of the law of arbitration agreement, the application of law of arbitration procedure and the limitation of the application of law of arbitration entity. The application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of commercial arbitral awards is the most extensive. This paper starts with the New York Convention and the Model Law, and then to the final report on refusal to enforce International Arbitral Awards on the grounds of Public Policy. Analysis of the limitations of public policy application will help to invoke public policy more accurately. China's domestic legislation and judicial practice both reflect public policy, but compared with other countries and regions where arbitration is at the forefront, the expression of public policy legislation is inconsistent. The limitation of arbitrability indicates that there are still some problems to be improved, and the defects of the legislation will bring some negative effects to the judicial practice. This paper analyzes the current situation of the application of public policy in China from the aspects of arbitrability, application of arbitration law, recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards, and puts forward further suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 赵秀文;;从永宁公司案看公共政策作为我国法院拒绝执行外国仲裁裁决的理由[J];法学家;2009年04期
2 张艾清;荷兰商事仲裁法律与实践若干问题探究[J];法学评论;2000年01期
3 张艾清;;国际商事仲裁中公共政策事项的可仲裁性问题研究[J];法学评论;2007年06期
4 肖永平,朱克鹏;论强制性规则与公共政策对国际商事仲裁的影响[J];国际贸易问题;1997年09期
5 徐琳;;国际商事仲裁裁决承认与执行中的公共政策[J];河北法学;2009年07期
6 徐妤;;知识产权仲裁的理论与实践[J];仲裁研究;2008年01期
7 杨玲;;国际商事仲裁公共政策司法界定的实践与发展[J];政治与法律;2010年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 陈晶;国际商事仲裁程序法律适用研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
2 张贝;论公共政策在国际商事仲裁中的适用[D];武汉大学;2005年
3 王翠玉;国际商事仲裁中公共政策事项的可仲裁性理论探究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
4 胡丹;国际商事仲裁法律适用中的公共政策[D];湘潭大学;2009年
5 倪鑫;国际商事仲裁中的公共政策问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
，本文编号：2428196
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2428196.html
