中非BITs中的投资争端解决机制

发布时间：2019-06-15 12:32

【摘要】：非洲独特的地理位置，丰富的自然资源，使其成为中国重要的投资市场。然而，非洲国家近年来动荡频繁，战火连连，给中国投资者带来很大的政治风险。中非双边投资条约是中国和非洲国家关于鼓励和促进投资的协定，是双方互相开展投资活动和解决投资争端的法律依据。随着中国投资者对非洲直接投资活动的增加、规模的扩大，为了更好地保障中国投资者的投资利益，改善对非洲投资的法律环境，促进非洲经济的发展，达到中非双方共赢的局面，亟待就现有的中非双边投资条约中的投资争端解决机制进行分析和研究，针对条款中存在的问题提出完善建议。本文首先介绍了中国和非洲双边投资条约的签订概况和基本框架，从投资待遇、征收和战乱赔偿等基本条款分析了中非BITs的主要内容和特点，指出其中可能引发投资争议的问题。其次，重点分析中非BITs中的争端解决条款，总结归纳了缔约双方投资争议和投资者与东道国投资争议解决的几种方式，并通过评价和分析发现投资争议解决机制中存在的缺陷，针对这些缺陷提出改进建议。最后，，介绍专设仲裁庭和国际投资争端解决中心（ICSID）的仲裁机制，包括仲裁规则、仲裁庭的组成、仲裁范围和适用的法律等方面，比较分析两者的异同点，总结认为仲裁作为目前解决中非投资争端的最佳选择，仍需要进一步发展和完善。
[Abstract]:Africa's unique geographical location and rich natural resources make it an important investment market in China. However, African countries have been volatile and belligerent in recent years, posing great political risks to Chinese investors. The bilateral investment treaty between China and Africa is the agreement between China and African countries on encouraging and promoting investment, and it is the legal basis for the two sides to carry out investment activities and settle investment disputes. With the increase of Chinese investors' direct investment activities in Africa and the expansion of their scale, in order to better protect the investment interests of Chinese investors, improve the legal environment for investment in Africa, promote the development of African economies, and achieve a win-win situation between China and Africa, it is urgent to analyze and study the existing investment dispute settlement mechanism in bilateral investment treaties and put forward some suggestions on the problems existing in the clauses. This paper first introduces the general situation and basic framework of bilateral investment treaties between China and Africa, analyzes the main contents and characteristics of BITs in China and Africa from the basic provisions of investment treatment, expropriation and war compensation, and points out the problems that may lead to investment disputes. Secondly, it focuses on the dispute settlement clauses in China and Africa BITs, summarizes several ways of settlement of investment disputes between contracting parties and investors and host countries, and finds out the defects in the investment dispute settlement mechanism through evaluation and analysis, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement in view of these defects. Finally, this paper introduces the arbitration mechanism of special arbitral tribunal and (ICSID), including arbitration rules, composition of arbitral tribunal, scope of arbitration and applicable law, compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between them, and concludes that arbitration, as the best choice for settlement of investment disputes between China and Africa, still needs to be further developed and improved.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4;D997.4

【参考文献】