论国际投仲裁中的比例原则

发布时间：2019-06-25 17:37

【摘要】：比例原则是处理目标和手段之间的关系的原则。它即要求目标的合法性,又要求手段的必要性和合理性。2003年,国际投资争端解决中心利用比例原则对Tecmed v. Mexico案作出了裁决。这一仲裁实践引起了国际社会对比例原则的广泛关注。基于比例原则包含的平衡国家公共利益和私人合法权益的法学理念,国际社会推断,比例原则将会在更多的国际投资仲裁案件中得到应用。果不其然,在Tecmed v. Mexico案之后,ICSID仲裁庭又在以阿根廷为被申请的人的一系列案件中运用了比例原则。虽然ICSID仲裁庭在适用比例原则的过程中仍存在一些争议,但是比例原则的使用已经变成一种新的趋势。相对于非歧视待遇原则,比例原则对东道国提出了更高的要求,其甚至被认为是公平公正待遇原则的一个具体标准。比例原则的适用具有一定的灵活性,因此赋予了仲裁庭较大的自由裁量权,使仲裁庭能够审查主权国家的投资政策和公共利益。中国新一轮的双边投资协定大都全面接受了ICSID的管辖权,但却很少包含重大安全例外条款。在我国政府对外资监管还存在很多漏洞的今天,这样的状况为对我国在投资争端中处于不利地位埋下了隐患。因此,我国政府应该结合当前实际,对比例原则的应用给以足够的关注,并采取相应的措施,完善我国的投资政策和监管措施。
[Abstract]:The principle of proportionality is the principle of dealing with the relationship between the object and the means. It called for the legitimacy of the objective and the necessity and reasonableness of the means. In 2003, the International Investment Dispute Settlement Centre made a decision on the Tecmed v. Mexico case using the principle of proportionality. The practice of arbitration has raised the international community's extensive attention to the principle of proportionality. Based on the principle of proportionality, which is the legal concept of balancing the public interest and the private legal rights and interests of the State, the international community concludes that the principle of proportionality will be applied in the case of more international investment arbitration cases. As a result, in the case of the Tecmed v. Mexico case, the ICSID arbitral tribunal used the proportional principle in a series of cases in which Argentina was the subject of the application. Although the ICSID arbitral tribunal still has some disputes in the process of the application of the proportional principle, the use of the proportional principle has become a new trend. With respect to the principle of non-discrimination, the principle of proportionality raised higher requirements for the host country, which was even considered a specific criterion for the principle of equitable and fair treatment. The application of the proportional principle has a certain degree of flexibility, thus giving the arbitral tribunal a greater discretionary power to allow the arbitral tribunal to review the investment policy and the public interest of sovereign States. The new round of bilateral investment agreements in China have generally accepted the jurisdiction of the ICSID, but rarely contain major security exceptions. In our country, there are many loopholes in the regulation of foreign investment, which is a hidden danger to our country's unfavorable position in the investment dispute. Therefore, the government of our country should combine the current reality, the application of the proportion principle to the sufficient attention, and take the corresponding measures to improve our country's investment policy and supervision measures.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】