最高人民法院首个指导性案例的法律经济学分析——“跳单案”案例研究

发布时间：2018-01-02 15:05

本文关键词：最高人民法院首个指导性案例的法律经济学分析——“跳单案”案例研究　出处：《财经问题研究》2012年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："跳单案"作为中国最高人民法院首批首个指导性案例,类似于英美法系中的"判例"或"先例性判决",这是大陆法系和英美法系相互借鉴的伟大尝试,也是中国法治建设中具有里程碑意义的事件。但是从法律经济学的视角审视此案例,可以发现初级法院一审判决、中级法院二审判决和最高法院指导意见背后的法理学和经济学依据尚不够充分。本文通过对"跳单"行为是否违约、是否违法、是否合理等问题的法律经济学分析,根据"合理推定"原则、效率理念、激励相容原理对该案件判据提出进一步改进意见,以促进类似"跳单问题"法律纠纷的解决,并推动《合同法》的修改和完善。
[Abstract]:"Jump China case" as the Supreme People's Court of the first the first guiding case, similar to the common law in the "case" or "precedent judgment", this is a great attempt of civil law and common law from each other, but also has significance in the construction of rule by law China milepost event. But from the perspective of legal economics in this case, can be found in the primary court, intermediate people's court and the Supreme Court upheld the guiding opinions behind the jurisprudence and the economic basis is insufficient. Based on the "jump" behavior is illegal, whether the breach of contract, legal economics analysis is reasonable and so on, according to the "reasonable" principle of presumption, efficiency idea, incentive compatibility principle of the case criterion is proposed to promote further improvements, similar to "solve legal disputes single hop" problems, and promote the "contract law" revised and improved.

【作者单位】：天津财经大学;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金“‘跳单问题’的BTC范式及其应用”(71272190)
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 一、案例概述——跳单问题2011年12月20日,中国最高人民法院发布《关于发布第一批指导性案例的通知》[1],公布了首批四个指导性案例,并指出法官在审理类似案件时应参照这些指导性案例。此规定意味着指导性案例已经具有实质性的法律约束力,突破了大陆法系(或成文法系)法官不能

【参考文献】