我国合同解除异议制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-11 20:16

本文关键词：我国合同解除异议制度研究　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：合同解除异议制度是我国合同解除制度的一项重要内容,在社会实践中被大量运用,施行以来,为平衡合同当事人双方利益和统一相关案例的裁判尺度发挥了重要作用。但随着审判实践经验的积累和理论研究的不断深入,各级人民法院在具体适用合同解除异议相关规则时出现了大量“同案不同判”的情形,严重影响了司法的公信力。因此,加强对我国合同解除异议制度基本理论的研究,具有很强的理论和实践意义。本文共分为五个部分:第一部分梳理了我国合同解除异议制度的实践困境和理论困惑。该部分采用实证研究法,通过对搜集到的大量相关案例进行整合分析,揭示出“同案不同判”的实践困境,并指出我国合同解除异议制度在适用中的理论困惑,奠定了本文的研究方向。第二部分阐述了我国合同解除异议制度的理论根据。该部分立足于合同解除的涵义与类型,重点对合同解除异议制度的形成逻辑和价值追求进行检视,以探究我国合同解除异议制度的运行机理。第三部分剖析了我国合同解除异议制度的适用规则。该部分首先从异议的内容与方式、异议期间及其法律效果三个方面分析了我国合同解除异议制度的行使规则;然后对形式审查说和实质审查说两种不同异议期解释学说的利弊进行重点剖析,得出不管采用哪种学说,都会出现不可调和的理论矛盾的结论。第四部分反思了我国合同解除异议权的性质和异议期间的设立目的。该部分首先审视了异议权的实体权利属性,指出合同解除异议权不应是一种实体权利,而应是一种归属于合同双方的提起确认之诉的诉权。然后检讨了创设异议期间以实现尽早确定合同关系目的的实效性,指出现行异议期规则的运行并不能实现其预期目的。第五部分探讨了重构我国合同解除异议制度的最佳方案。该部分试图通过对“要约—承诺之路”、“不异议—承诺之路”、“异议期强行明示之路”三种主要重构方案进行比较和反思,最后探求出“合同双方诉权的相互限制之路”才是重构我国合同解除异议制度的正道。
[Abstract]:The dissent system of contract rescission is an important part of the contract rescission system in our country. It has been widely used in social practice since its implementation. It plays an important role in balancing the interests of both parties to the contract and unifying the judgment scale of relevant cases, but with the accumulation of trial experience and the deepening of theoretical research. People's courts at all levels in the specific application of the relevant rules of dissent of contract rescission appeared a large number of "different judgments in the same case", which seriously affected the credibility of the judiciary. Strengthen the research on the basic theory of the dissent system of contract rescission in our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part combs the practical dilemma and theoretical confusion of the system of dissent from contract in China. This part adopts the empirical research method. Through the integration analysis of a large number of relevant cases collected, this paper reveals the practical dilemma of "different judgments in the same case", and points out the theoretical confusion in the application of the dissent system of contract rescission in our country. The second part expounds the theoretical basis of the dissent system of contract rescission in our country. This part is based on the meaning and type of contract rescission. It focuses on the formation logic and value pursuit of the dissent system of contract rescission. In order to explore the operating mechanism of the dissent system of contract rescission in our country. The third part analyzes the applicable rules of the dissenting system of contract termination in our country. This part begins with the contents and methods of dissent. During the period of dissent and its legal effect, the author analyzes the rules of the dissent system of contract rescission in China. Then the paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two different interpretation theories of form review and substantive review, and draws the conclusion that no matter which theory is adopted. The conclusion of irreconcilable theoretical contradiction will appear. Part 4th reflects on the nature of the right of dissent and the purpose of establishment during the period of dissent. This part first examines the property of substantive right of the right of dissent. It is pointed out that the right of dissent from the contract should not be a substantive right. It should be a kind of litigation right that belongs to both parties to the contract. Then it reviews the effectiveness of the establishment of the objection period in order to achieve the purpose of determining the contractual relationship as soon as possible. It is pointed out that the operation of the current rule of dissent period can not achieve its expected purpose. Part 5th discusses the best scheme of reconstructing the system of dissent from contract in our country. This part attempts to pass "the road of offer-acceptance". "No objection-the road of commitment", "dissent period forced express way" three kinds of main reconstruction plan carries on the comparison and the reflection. Finally, it is the correct way to reconstruct the system of dissent from contract to find out "the way of mutual limitation of the litigant right of both parties to the contract".
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】