论第三人缔约过失责任的制度构建

发布时间：2018-01-17 17:35

本文关键词：论第三人缔约过失责任的制度构建　出处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2014年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对于缔约关系,我国《合同法》和《侵权责任法》虽然都有所规定,但其规定的调整对象都是针对缔约双方当事人而言的。而对于在缔约过程中,因第三人的介入而给缔约当事人造成损害的情形,这两个制度都无法提供合理并全面的救济。但在司法实践中,又存在着第三人侵害当事人缔约关系的法律纠纷,为此,我们应当构建第三人缔约过失责任制度,现阶段考虑到立法的缓慢性与司法实践解决类似法律纠纷的紧迫性之间的矛盾,遵循法律适用的目标,可以依据诚实信用原则将缔约过失责任扩大至第三人,在法律没有明确规定的情况下,最高院可以先通过设立典型案例的方式来解决其适用与推广过程中存在的不确定性。
[Abstract]:The contract Law and Tort liability Law of our country have some provisions, but the object of regulation is for both parties, but in the process of contracting. The two systems can not provide reasonable and comprehensive relief for the damage to the contracting parties caused by the intervention of the third party, but in judicial practice. There are also legal disputes in which the third party infringes on the contracting relationship of the parties. Therefore, we should construct the liability system of the third party's contracting negligence. In view of the contradiction between the slowness of legislation and the urgency of resolving similar legal disputes in judicial practice at the present stage, following the goal of applying the law, we can expand the liability of fault in contracting to the third party according to the principle of good faith. In the absence of clear legal provisions, the Supreme Court can first solve the uncertainty in its application and promotion by setting up a typical case.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出我国《合同法》对缔约过失责任进行了规定,解决了缔约关系中因任一方致使对方信赖利益受损的法律救济问题。但并没有涉及因除当事人以外的第三人的故意行为而致使合同无效的情形。然而司法实践中,又存在着一些第三人侵害当事人缔约关系的法律纠纷:案例一:托马斯

【参考文献】