“勒索性提价”的法律思考

发布时间：2018-01-23 06:35

本文关键词： 勒索性提价市场自由最高限价效用最大化　出处：《山东大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“勒索性提价”,是受灾害影响地区在经济恢复过程中,必然会出现的经济现象,对“勒索性提价”进行法律干预应着眼于受灾地区社会效益的最大化,允许灾后市场在一定范围内的涨价,保证灾后市场供给,但涨价幅度应在消费者的承受范围之内。我国现有的《反垄断法》、《价格法》、《合同法》都无法通过现有的法律规定对因“勒索性提价”而遭受损失的消费者提供法律救济；对“勒索性提价”的法律经济分析表明,对“勒索性提价”的法律干预不仅仅是因为该行为是不道德的,还在于“勒索性提价”造成其他市场主体成本与风险的增加,而导致市场主体间实质上的不公平；对“勒索性提价”的法律干预,可以采取三个路径进行：限制价格上涨比例,允许与重建相关的商品在一定幅度内上涨；限制恶意涨价,允许相关商品价格在供求关系影响下的变化,但禁止恶意涨价；全面限制价格上涨,禁止与灾后地区重建有关的商品价格的上涨；“限制价格上涨比例”,确定合理的“比例”是关键,“限制恶意涨价”,对“恶意”的界定是执法的关键,“全面禁止”完全违背市场规律。
[Abstract]:The " extortion price " is an inevitable economic phenomenon in the process of economic recovery in the area affected by the disaster . The legal intervention on the " extortion price " should focus on the maximization of the social benefit in the affected area , allow the post - disaster market to increase in a certain range , and guarantee the supply of the post - disaster market , but the price increases should be within the scope of the consumer ' s acceptance . The legal economic analysis of " extortion price " is not only because the behavior is immoral , but also lies in the increase of the cost and risk of other market subjects , which leads to the infairness among the market subjects ; Legal intervention to " extortion " could take three routes : limiting the proportion of price increases , allowing commodities related to reconstruction to rise within a certain range ; limiting the price increase , allowing the price of related commodities to change under the influence of supply and demand , but prohibiting the rise of commodity prices related to the reconstruction of the post - disaster area ; limiting the proportion of price increases , defining reasonable " proportion " as the key , limiting the definition of " malicious " as the key to law enforcement , and " total prohibition " totally contrary to the market law .

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】