违约方合同解除权研究——以解释论为视角

发布时间：2018-01-25 20:58

本文关键词： 违约方合同解除解除权解释路径　出处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国民法学界对于合同解除制度讨论众多,但并未立法明确赋予违约方解除权。大量的司法实践表明,违约方主动解除合同的现象已经确实存在,赋予违约方合同解除权,一方面可以鼓励违约方积极赔偿或补偿,另一方面也可以提高整个社会的经济效益。在目前的司法框架下,采取解释论的方式才能更好地解决违约方解除合同的合法路径问题,若坚持以合同法第94条第一款为基础解释违约方的合同解除权利,将会产生违约方机会解约,给守约方带来诉累等问题。从《合同法》第110条规定的三种例外情形的适用范围和后果来分析,在这三种情形发生后,强制履行不能,原合同目的无法实现,合同将陷入僵持。因此,以合同法第110条为基础,结合合同法司法解释第26条,通过履行不能的体系,解释违约方解除合同的条件和方式较为合适,这一解释路径能使法律更好地回应司法实践,为我国的社会经济发展提供更可靠的保障。
[Abstract]:There are many discussions on the system of rescission of contract in the civil law circle of our country, but there is no legislation to give the breaching party the right of rescission. A large number of judicial practices show that the phenomenon of the breaching party cancelling the contract voluntarily already exists. By giving the breaching party the right to terminate the contract, on the one hand, it can encourage the breaching party to make positive compensation or compensation, on the other hand, it can also improve the economic benefit of the whole society. Only by adopting the theory of interpretation can we better solve the problem of the lawful way for the breaching party to terminate the contract. If we insist on interpreting the contract rescission right of the breaching party on the basis of the first paragraph of Article 94 of the contract Law. There will be the opportunity for breaching party to terminate the contract, bring the compliance party tired and other issues. From the "contract Law" 110 provisions of the three exceptions to the scope of application and consequences to analyze, after these three situations occurred. Enforcement performance can not, the original purpose of the contract can not be achieved, the contract will be deadlocked. Therefore, based on Article 110 of the contract Law, combined with the judicial interpretation of Article 26 of the contract Law, through the performance of the system. It is more appropriate to explain the conditions and ways for the breaching party to terminate the contract, which can make the law better respond to the judicial practice and provide a more reliable guarantee for the social and economic development of our country.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出2006年第6期《最高人民法院公报》刊登了一则违约方主动解除合同的案例,该案的裁判摘要写到:“根据合同法第110条规定,有违约行为的一方当事人请求解除合同,没有违约行为的另一方当事人要求继续履行合同,当违约方继续履行所需的财力、物力超过合同双方基于合同

【参考文献】