我国合同法中同时履行抗辩权的效力问题研究——以实体法与程序法为透析视角

发布时间：2018-02-01 14:52

本文关键词： 同时履行抗辩权实体法程序法效力问题　出处：《河北法学》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：同时履行抗辩权是合同法的重要制度之一,其立法目的是督促合同双方履行各自的合同义务,发挥着既"避免授予信用"又"增施履行激励"的价值功能。目前,学界主要从同时履行抗辩权的理论基础和实体法角度展开研究,但在司法中如何适用及在程序法视角下的效力如何也具有较强的研究价值,如举证责任、当事人如何主张、对法院判决的效力有何影响等问题。
[Abstract]:At the same time, the right of defense is one of the important systems of contract law, and its legislative purpose is to urge both parties to fulfill their respective contractual obligations. It plays the value function of "avoiding the granting of credit" and "increasing performance incentive". At present, the academic circles mainly from the theoretical basis of the right to simultaneously fulfill the defense and substantive law perspective to carry out research. However, how to apply in the administration of justice and how to effect in the perspective of procedural law also have a strong research value, such as the burden of proof, how the parties claim, and what impact on the effectiveness of the court judgment, and so on.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6
【正文快照】： (中国人民大学法学院,北京100872)我国《合同法》第66条规定了同时履行抗辩权具有重要的价值功能和实践意义,其立法目的是督促合同双方履行各自的合同义务。同时履行抗辩权,一般是指在未规定履行顺序的双务合同中,一方之当事人在另一方之当事人没有进行对待给付之前拒绝先为给

【参考文献】