善意取得私卖共有房屋所有权诉讼的审判误区及对策

发布时间：2018-02-23 11:40

本文关键词： 善意取得不动产所有权审判误区合同效力　出处：《国家检察官学院学报》2012年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：物权法确立了不动产所有权的善意取得制度,私卖共有房屋所体现的法律关系,成为现实生活中适用该制度的典型代表。为权衡第三人、原权利人和交易秩序三方利益,审判机关须厘清《合同法》第五十一条与《物权法》第一百零六条的关系,正确处理无权处分合同与因善意取得而发生物权变动的矛盾。以解决审判实践中私卖共有房屋诉讼出现的实际问题为出发点,采取解释论的方法,为法律适用确立一个基本理论,即在否认无因性原则的前提下,将物权行为概念应用于对此类案件法律关系的梳理,从而明确该类案件的常规诉讼路径和审判模式,以便审判机关针对不同的案情找到共同的切入点引导诉讼并进行裁判。
[Abstract]:The law of real right establishes the system of bona fide acquisition of real estate ownership, and the legal relationship embodied in the private sale of the common house becomes a typical representative of the application of the system in real life, in order to weigh the interests of the third party, the original right holder and the transaction order. The judicial organs should clarify the relationship between Article 51th of the contract Law and Article 106th of the Law on Real Rights. To correctly deal with the contradiction between the contract of unauthorized disposition and the change of real right caused by bona fide acquisition, to solve the practical problems arising in the litigation of private sale of common house in trial practice, and to adopt the method of explanation, To establish a basic theory for the application of law, that is, on the premise of denying the principle of non-causality, the concept of real right act is applied to sort out the legal relationship of such cases, so as to clarify the routine litigation path and trial mode of such cases. So that the judicial organs to find a common entry point for different cases to guide the proceedings and adjudicate.
【作者单位】：北京市高级人民法院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】