当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

穷困抗辩权研究

发布时间:2018-02-26 01:01

  本文关键词: 赠与合同 穷困 抗辩权 完善 出处:《南昌大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:基于赠与合同的无偿性,各国法律都对赠与人利益的保护作出了特殊规定,穷困抗辩权正是优待赠与人的具体表现。我国合同法195条对此加以规定。这无疑是立法的一大进步,但由于其规定比较简单,可操作性不强,无法解决现实生活中出现的纠纷。同时国内学术界对穷困抗辩权缺乏全面的研究,大都囿于穷困抗辩权的个别问题。因此,笔者希望通过立足于民法基本理论,运用分析法、比较法、归纳法等方法,对穷困抗辩权的相关问题进行比较系统的研究,以期对完善我国的穷困抗辩权制度有所帮助。 本文分为三个部分:第一部分简要介绍穷困抗辩权的一般理论,包括概念、性质和理论基础。通过比较中外相关的法律规定及学术观点,指出我国穷困抗辩权的性质为抗辩权,其理论基础为民法的公平原则、情势变更原则和赠与合同的无偿性,以便为后面的论述奠定基础。第二部分对穷困抗辩权的适用条件进行了研究。通过细究法条,阐述穷困抗辩权的具体适用条件。第三部分是本文的重点。通过分析我国现行法律制度存在的空白,在借鉴他国经验,立足我国实际的基础上,提出相关的立法建议。
[Abstract]:Based on the gratuitous nature of the gift contract, the laws of all countries have made special provisions on the protection of the donator's interests, and the right of poor defense is the concrete manifestation of preferential treatment to the donor. But because its stipulation is relatively simple, the maneuverability is not strong, cannot solve the dispute which appears in the real life. At the same time, the domestic academic circles lacks the comprehensive research to the poverty defense right, most is confined to the individual question of the poverty defense right. The author hopes that based on the basic theory of civil law, using the methods of analysis, comparison, induction and so on, the author will make a relatively systematic study on the relevant issues of the right to defend poverty in order to help improve the system of the right to defend poverty in our country. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part briefly introduces the general theory of the right to defend poverty, including the concept, nature and theoretical basis. It is pointed out that the nature of the right to plead poverty in China is the right of defense, and its theoretical basis is the principle of fairness in civil law, the principle of change of circumstances and the gratuitous nature of the grant contract. In order to lay the foundation for the following exposition. The second part has carried on the research to the poverty defense right application condition. The third part is the focus of this paper. By analyzing the gaps in our country's current legal system and drawing on the experience of other countries, based on the actual situation of our country, the author puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 赵万一;民法公平原则的伦理分析[J];重庆社会科学;2004年02期

2 汪传才;穷困抗辩权初探[J];法学杂志;2005年02期

3 张晓军;李川;;穷困抗辩权析解[J];法律适用;2011年02期

4 万金湖,陈光华;赠与的无偿性之本质探析[J];湖南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年04期

5 李旭东;段小兵;;试论我国合同信赖利益损害赔偿制度的完善[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期

6 苏敏;再论对受赠人信赖利益损失的法律救济[J];徐州师范大学学报;2004年06期

7 金博;;赠与合同信赖利益保护探究[J];政法学刊;2008年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 王燕云;不可任意撤销的赠与和赠与义务履行的拒绝[D];清华大学;2003年

2 熊斌;赠与合同若干问题研究[D];暨南大学;2006年

3 颜慧霞;论穷困抗辩权[D];暨南大学;2009年



本文编号:1535853

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1535853.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户357ac***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com