当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

论无权处分与合同效力

发布时间:2018-02-26 03:15

  本文关键词: 无权处分 物权变动 权利瑕疵担保责任 出处:《苏州大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:采取不同的物权变动模式的国家,无权处分的涵义也不同。以我国《民法通则》为代表的民事基本法中所采取的物权变动立法模式既与以法国民法为代表的债权意思主义不同,也不同于以德国民法为代表的物权形式主义。我国的物权变动模式是以债权合同为依据,与交付或登记相结合才发生变动效果的债权形式主义。因此,无权处分在我国现行法律中的涵义是指无处分权的人所订立的、引起标的物的权利变动为目的的债权合同,无权处分合同的效力不因缺少处分权而当然无效。 我国《合同法》借鉴了台湾法、德国法上处分行为的概念,却又不承认物权行为理论。立法上对于“处分”的相关概念的误认导致我国司法界与理论界就此问题在认识上存在较大的混乱。笔者认为解决这一混乱的根本办法是要重新界定“处分”的相关概念,在此基础上再对我国的无权处分规则进行重新建构,以期为当前采取债权形式主义物权变动模式下的中国无权处分制度困境寻找一条出路。
[Abstract]:Countries adopting different modes of real right change have different meanings of unauthorized disposition. The legislative mode of real right alteration in the basic civil law, represented by China's "General principles of Civil Law", is different from the meaning doctrine of creditor's rights represented by French civil law. It is also different from the formalism of real right represented by German civil law. The mode of real right change in our country is creditor's right formalism, which is based on the contract of creditor's rights and combined with delivery or registration. The meaning of unauthorized disposition in the current law of our country refers to the contract of creditor's rights concluded by the person with nowhere to separate and causing the change of the rights of the subject matter. The validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition is not invalid because of the lack of the right to dispose. China's contract Law draws lessons from the concept of disciplinary action under the laws of Taiwan and Germany. However, the theory of the act of real right is not recognized. The misunderstanding of the related concept of "disposition" in legislation leads to a great confusion in the understanding of this problem in the judicial and theoretical circles of our country. The author thinks that the fundamental way to solve this confusion is to solve this problem. The law is to redefine the related concept of "punishment", On this basis, the author reconstructs the rules of unauthorized disposition in order to find a way out for the predicament of China's unauthorized disposition system under the mode of property right alteration of creditor's right formalism.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 王利明;抵押权若干问题的探讨[J];法学;2000年11期

2 王育才;法律经济学初探[J];法学研究;1994年05期

3 孙宪忠;物权变动的原因与结果的区分原则[J];法学研究;1999年05期

4 崔建远;无权处分辨——合同法第51条规定的解释与适用[J];法学研究;2003年01期

5 丁文联;;无权处分与合同效力——合同法第51条的理解与适用[J];南京大学法律评论;1999年02期

6 孙鹏;论无权处分行为——兼析《合同法》第51条[J];现代法学;2000年04期



本文编号:1536287

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1536287.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b1a78***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com