当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

论买卖合同标的物灭失的风险负担

发布时间:2018-03-12 20:49

  本文选题:风险 切入点:风险负担 出处:《黑龙江大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:买卖合同是经济全球化格局当中使用最为普遍的合同,与之相关联的风险负担制度便成为合同法的中心问题之一,世界各国的立法均对此制度给予了高度重视。在我国的合同法中,虽然有关于买卖合同标的物风险负担的相关规定,但由于规定的内容并不全面,致使在实践过程中,给当事人运用法律维护自身的合法权益造成了一定的困难。 本文首先对风险的概念、特点、风险事由的范围进行界定。同时,对于目前存在的三大立法模式进行逐一评析,通过比对总结出相应模式的优缺点。其次,将各国关于买卖合同标的物风险负担一般规则与特殊规则的立法规定进行了详细梳理。再次,也是本文的最大亮点在于,通过实证分析的方法,引出目前我国关于买卖合同标的物风险负担规则的争议焦点,,侧重对“风险负担的前提”、“违约时标的物风险负担规则”、“路货买卖时标的物风险负担规则”和“涉及运输时风险负担规则”这四类情况进行分析,将外国先进立法规定与我国立法规定相比较,进而发现我国《合同法》关于标的物风险负担规定之不足,并提出相应的完善建议,以期能够对理论和实践起到一定促进作用。
[Abstract]:Sale and purchase contract is the most common contract in the pattern of economic globalization, and the risk burden system associated with it has become one of the central problems of contract law. In the contract law of our country, although there are some relevant provisions on the risk burden of the subject matter of the contract for sale and purchase, the contents of the regulations are not comprehensive, resulting in the process of practice. To the parties to use the law to protect their legitimate rights and interests caused certain difficulties. In this paper, the concept, characteristics and scope of risk are defined. At the same time, the three existing legislative models are evaluated one by one, and the advantages and disadvantages of the corresponding models are summed up by comparison. The legislative provisions of the general rules and special rules on the risk burden of the subject-matter of sale and purchase contract are combed in detail. Thirdly, the biggest bright spot of this paper is that, through the method of empirical analysis, Leading to the current focus of our country on the subject matter of sale and purchase contract risk burden rules, Focusing on the "premise of the risk burden", the "risk burden rules on the subject matter at the time of default", the "risk burden rules on the subject matter in the sale of goods by road" and the "risk burden rules in relation to transport", By comparing the foreign advanced legislative provisions with those of our country, the author finds out the deficiency of the provisions on the risk burden of the subject matter in the contract Law of China, and puts forward corresponding suggestions for perfection, in the hope that they can promote the theory and practice to a certain extent.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 王利明;中德买卖合同制度的比较[J];比较法研究;2001年01期

2 王轶;论买卖合同标的物毁损、灭失的风险负担[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);1999年04期

3 李晶;违约对货物风险转移的影响——UCC与CISG相关条款对比分析[J];对外经贸实务;2003年05期

4 常凤梅;违约对标的物风险转移的影响[J];辽宁税务高等专科学校学报;2003年03期

5 段亚伟;;论物权变动与买卖合同标的物风险转移的关系[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 郑洁;买卖合同标的物之风险负担研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 赵增辉;买卖合同风险负担规则研究[D];郑州大学;2005年

3 祝庆梦;买卖合同标的物风险负担规则的研究[D];南昌大学;2008年

4 焦敏;买卖合同中的风险负担规则研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年

5 周伟;论买卖合同风险负担制度[D];西南政法大学;2009年

6 刘小宇;合同法中的风险负担问题研究[D];山东大学;2009年

7 郭晓梅;交付主义模式下买卖合同风险转移制度的分析[D];黑龙江大学;2010年



本文编号:1603245

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1603245.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bb35b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com