论创意的法律保护模式

发布时间：2018-03-18 20:10

本文选题：创意　切入点：原始表达　出处：《科技管理研究》2011年19期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：创意应当予以保护,这一点毫无疑问,而其是否应进入法律直接保护的视野则存有争议。创意存在于"第二世界",是抽象的、无形的,是任何外人都无法感知的存在,理应不在法律直接保护范围之内,但是当创意作者将创意表达出来,形成创意的原始表达后,则应该予以法律保护,而且正是对此种表现形式的法律保护才间接使得创意作者在创意生成过程中投入的智力劳动有所救济。基于此,探讨了包含合同法、知识产权、不当得利在内的对创意原始表达可能提供保护的各种法律制度,并提出任何单一性质的保护从目前的法律制度来看均属不完善,应该对创意的原始表达予以综合法律手段保护的建议。
[Abstract]:There is no doubt that creativity should be protected, and whether it should enter the field of direct legal protection is controversial. It exists in the "second world", abstract, invisible, and invisible to anyone outside the world. It should not be under the direct protection of the law, but when the creative author expresses the idea and forms the original expression of the idea, it should be protected by law. Moreover, it is the legal protection of this form of expression that indirectly makes the creative author's intellectual labor in the process of creative creation a relief. Based on this, this paper discusses the inclusion of contract law, intellectual property rights, The various legal systems that may provide protection against the original expression of creativity, including improper enrichment, and suggest that any protection of a single nature would be imperfect in the current legal system, The proposal that the original expression of creativity should be protected by comprehensive legal means.
【作者单位】：江西省景德镇陶瓷学院工商院;
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】