隐名代理制度研究
发布时间:2018-03-25 12:12
本文选题:隐名代理 切入点:代理 出处:《湖南师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:在市场经济条件下,代理制度因其有利于提高交易主体的活动效率,被广泛地运用在市场交易活动中。通过广泛地运用代理制度,不仅加快了交易主体的交易效率,同时也促进了产品的流通。为了适应经济领域中的多种需求,我国《合同法》在参照《国际货物销售代理公约》的基础上,充分地借鉴了英美代理法中的隐名代理制度,并在《合同法》委托合同一章中有着详细的规定。同时,在我国《合同法》中又规定了大陆法系的行纪合同制度,这样便产生了不同法律体系之间的冲突以及在司法实践中的适用分歧问题。基于此,对隐名代理制度进行研究具有重大的理论和现实意义。 通过对代理法的研究,可以发现无论是大陆法系还是英美法系中的代理,他们都具有同样的社会功能,即在被代理人和第三人之间建立一种关系,将二者连接起来。由于两大法系的不同经济文化背景和司法实践,造成了两大法系在代理制度上的差异。在代理的理论基础上,大陆法系坚持区别论,严格区分了委任和代理;而英美法系则坚持等同论,将代理人的行为等同于被代理人的行为。大陆法系中的代理制度以显名主义为原则,在我国的《民法通则》中,有关代理的规定也坚持显名主义。而英美法系中的隐名代理制度则未坚持这一主义,这样就使得隐名代理制度变得更加灵活,可以更好地在被代理人和第三人之间建立关系,更有助于实现代理的社会功能。我国《合同法》在委托合同一章中对隐名代理制度进行了规定,这在一定程度上满足了人们对代理的不同需求,适应了社会经济发展的趋势。然而,我国现阶段所规定的隐名代理制度还不是很完善,这主要体现在隐名代理制度与我国原有的代理制度相冲突,未协调好二者之间的关系,并且在实践中,对于某些问题是适用隐名代理还是适用行纪是很难区分的,这就产生了适用上的分歧。因此,针对我国隐名代理制度的不足之处,应当采取相应的措施来弥补这些不足,如完善隐名代理的法理依据、出台相应的司法解释以及制订专门的《商事代理法》。这对完善我国的隐名代理制度具有重大意义。
[Abstract]:Under the condition of market economy, agency system is widely used in market trading activities because it is beneficial to improve the activity efficiency of trading subjects. Through the extensive use of agency system, it not only accelerates the transaction efficiency of trading subjects. At the same time, it also promotes the circulation of products. In order to meet the various needs in the economic field, the contract Law of our country, on the basis of referring to the Convention on the International Sale of goods, fully draws on the anonymous agency system in the Anglo-American law of agency. At the same time, in the contract Law of China, the contract system of civil law is also stipulated. In this way, the conflicts between different legal systems and the differences of application in judicial practice arise. Based on this, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the system of anonymous agency. Through the study of the agency law, it can be found that both the civil law system and the common law system have the same social function, that is, to establish a relationship between the principal and the third party. Because of the different economic and cultural background and judicial practice of the two legal systems, the difference between the two legal systems in the agency system has been caused. On the basis of the theory of agency, the continental law system insists on the theory of distinction and strictly distinguishes the appointment from the agency; However, the Anglo-American legal system insists on the theory of equivalence and equates the behavior of the agent with that of the agent. The agency system in the civil law system is based on the principle of nominalism, in the General principles of Civil Law of our country. However, the system of anonymous agency in the common law system does not adhere to this doctrine, which makes the system of anonymous agency more flexible and can better establish the relationship between the principal and the third party. China's contract Law stipulates the system of anonymous agency in the chapter of entrustment contract, which, to a certain extent, meets people's different needs for agency. It adapts to the trend of social and economic development. However, the anonymous agency system stipulated in our country at the present stage is not very perfect, which is mainly reflected in the conflict between the anonymous agency system and the original agency system in our country, and the relationship between the two systems has not been well coordinated. And in practice, it is difficult to distinguish whether anonymous agent is applicable to some problems, which leads to differences in application. Therefore, in view of the shortcomings of anonymous agent system in our country, Corresponding measures should be taken to make up for these shortcomings, such as perfecting the legal basis of anonymous agency, issuing corresponding judicial interpretation and formulating special Commercial Agent Law, which is of great significance to perfecting the system of anonymous agency in our country.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 方新军;;对我国合同法第402、403条的评说——关于两大法系代理理论差异的再思考[J];北大法律评论;2001年02期
2 尹飞;;论隐名代理的构成与效力[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年03期
3 李飞鸣;;论我国《合同法》第402、403条之立法缺陷[J];法制与社会;2008年19期
4 许文峰;;隐名代理制度新议——从两大法系对比中研究《合同法》402条之规定[J];广州航海高等专科学校学报;2008年03期
5 刘志光;;隐名代理探析[J];法制与社会;2008年29期
6 徐静静;浅析隐名代理制度中的几个问题[J];商业经济;2004年12期
7 徐海燕;论我国代理制度的完善[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
8 桑士东;;试分析隐名代理中当事人之间的关系及我国隐名代理制度的完善[J];南京财经大学学报;2007年02期
9 范力军;论我国合同法确认隐名代理的必要性[J];中国农业大学学报(社会科学版);2002年02期
10 佟占军;;中国代理法律制度的解析与重构——以《合同法》第402条、403条为中心的探讨[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2008年04期
,本文编号:1663066
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1663066.html