欧洲法院与私法

发布时间：2018-03-25 15:18

本文选题：欧洲法院　切入点：先决程序　出处：《清华法学》2011年04期

【摘要】：本文探讨的是欧盟私法日益增多背景下欧洲法院在私法领域的重要性。同时,本文试图解释私法先决程序(referral procedure,vorabentscheidungsverfahren)的角色转换和欧盟私法支离破碎的特征。欧盟法分散的特点导致欧洲判例法显得很不确定甚至自相矛盾。本文将用《布鲁塞尔条约》、对消费者合同中不公平条款的司法审查以及非物质损害赔偿中的例子来证明这一点。《欧洲合同法原则》和《共同参考框架》在一定程度上满足了对欧洲私法基本原则的需求。就刚才提到的那些例子而言,这两份文件都提供了原则层面的、值得推荐给欧洲法院参考的解决方案。本文的最后一部分讨论的问题是:欧洲法院以目前的形式能否胜任一个拥有五亿人口的联盟的民事司法工作。由于仍应坚持审判庭的组成人员来自不同国家的状况,因此可以考虑在综合法院(the General Court)——也就是此前的一审法院——的层面实现欧洲法院的去中心化。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the importance of the European Court of Justice in the field of private law in the context of the increasing number of EU private law. This paper attempts to explain the conversion of the role of referral procedure (referral procedure) and the fragmentation of EU private law. The dispersion of EU law makes European case law very uncertain and even contradictory. The judicial review of unfair clauses in consumer contracts and examples of non-material damages prove this. The principles of European contract Law and the Common reference Framework are to some extent satisfied with European private law. The need for fundamental principles... In the case of the examples just mentioned, Both documents provide a principled dimension, The last part of this article discusses the question of whether the European Court of Justice in its current form is competent for the civil justice work of a coalition of 500 million people. The composition of the chamber is from different countries, So consider decentralizing the European Court of Justice at the level of the General Court, the former court of first instance.
【作者单位】：德国马克斯·普朗克比较私法与国际私法研究所;汉堡大学法学;清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D997

【共引文献】