邓柱基与工艺品公司房屋优先购买权一案之评析

发布时间：2018-04-10 08:59

本文选题：承租人优先购买权　切入点：局部承租人　出处：《湖南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：承租人享有所租住房屋的优先购买权是由《中华人民共和国合同法》第230条明确规定的。该法条规定，出租人在出售房屋之前，应当将这一情况在合理期限内通知房屋承租人，承租人享有在同等的条件下优先购买租住房屋的权利。但该法条规定得过于原则和笼统，在房屋租赁形式多样化、复杂化的今天，司法实务当中往往难以准确适用。局部承租人的优先购买权问题和“同等条件”的界定问题是承租人优先购买权纠纷中的焦点问题，学术界及司法实务界对其争议较大，不少法院裁判时将两者混为一谈，使得判决缺乏合理性。局部承租人的优先购买权问题和“同等条件”的界定问题是两个不同层次的问题，应首先明确局部承租人对租住房屋或整体房屋有无优先购买权，再分析是否具备了同等条件。局部承租人是否享有优先购买权应视所承租房屋产权独立与否区别对待，“同等条件”的内涵应包括相同的价格、相同的支付方式以及相同的从给付义务。承租人优先购买权性质的准确认定和其行使所产生的法律效果对案件的正确裁判十分重要，将承租人优先购买权定性为形成权，，并根据租赁合同备案与否赋予其物权属性或债权属性，能最大限度地保护出卖人、承租人和第三人的合法权益。本文运用法学理论知识对邓柱基与广州工艺品公司房屋优先购买权一案进行分析，在已有研究的基础上提出了自己的一些构想，希望对类似案件的处理提供一些参考意见。
[Abstract]:The lessee's preemptive right to rent a house is clearly stipulated in Article 230 of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China.The law provides that the lessor shall notify the lessee of the situation within a reasonable period before selling the house and that the lessee shall have the right to purchase the rental house in priority under the same conditions.However, the provisions of the law are too principle and general, in the form of housing rental diversification, complex today, judicial practice is often difficult to apply accurately.The preemptive right of partial lessee and the definition of "equal condition" are the focal points in the preemptive right dispute.It makes the judgment unreasonable.The preemptive right of partial lessee and the definition of "equal condition" are two different levels of problems. Firstly, it should be made clear whether the partial lessee has the preemptive right to rent house or the whole house, and then whether or not the same condition is available.Whether the partial lessee enjoys the preemptive right should be treated differently as the property right of the leased house is independent or not, and the connotation of "equal conditions" should include the same price, the same way of payment and the same obligation of subordinate payment.The accurate identification of the nature of the lessee's preemptive right and the legal effect produced by its exercise are very important to the correct judgment of the case, and the lessee's preemptive right is characterized as the formative right.According to whether the lease contract is put on record or not, it can protect the legal rights and interests of the seller, lessee and third party to the maximum extent.This paper uses the knowledge of law theory to analyze the case of Dengzhouji and Guangzhou handicraft company housing preemption right, puts forward some ideas on the basis of the existing research, and hopes to provide some reference opinions for the handling of similar cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】