论赠与人的任意撤销权

发布时间：2018-04-11 23:12

本文选题：赠与合同 + 任意撤销权　；参考：《山西大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：一般来说,根据“契约必守”原则,合同一经成立生效便对当事人产生法律拘束力,当事人不可以任意撤销。但赠与合同的单务、无偿性决定了赠与人的给付不能获得任何报偿且受赠人的获益无需付出任何代价,法律为保护善良赠与人的利益,特赋予赠与人在一定条件下改变自己初衷的权利。赠与人任意撤销权制度是在承认赠与合同诺成性、非要式性的基础上,为保护赠与人利益作出的特殊规定,这种立法模式与将赠与合同规定为实践合同或要式合同的立法模式具有相同的立法目的,都是平衡赠与合同双方当事人的利益。除引言、结论外,本文共分四部分来分析研究赠与人任意撤销权制度,概述如下：第一部分概括论述赠与人任意撤销权制度。首先简要阐述了赠与人任意撤销权制度的含义和性质,然后介绍了赠与人任意撤销权与相关法律概念的异同,并对赠与人任意撤销权的法理依据与制度提前提作了详细论述。第二部分比较分析国内外关于赠与人仃意撤销权的立法模式,主要分为规定有任意撤销权制度的立法模式与没有规定任意撤销权的两种立法模式,前者主要介绍了日本民法、我国台湾地区及大陆地区民法的立法模式,后者主要介绍了罗马法、德国法、法国法的立法模式,并对以上立法模式进行了比较分析。第三部分指出我国赠与人任意撤销权制度存在的立法缺陷。具体包括缺乏对行使任意撤销权的必要限制、缺乏对受赠人利益的保护机制、《合同法》相关条款规定不完善等。第四部分详细阐述完善我国赠与人任意撤销权制度的立法建议。包括限制赠与人任意撤销权的行使方式和行使期间,扩大不可任意撤销合同的范围,规定任意撤销权的行使主体包括受赠人,建立对受赠人信赖利益损失的赔偿制度,对《合同法》相关条款的完善等。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, according to the principle of "contract must be adhered to", once the contract is established and effective, it has legal binding force on the parties, and the parties can not cancel it arbitrarily.But the single service of the gift contract, free of charge, determines that the donator can not obtain any reward for the benefit of the donator and that the benefit of the grantee does not have to pay any price. The law protects the interests of the good donator.The donator is given the right to change his original intention under certain conditions.The system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission is a special provision for the protection of the donator's interests on the basis of the recognition of the nature of the donation contract and the necessity of the nature of the donation.This kind of legislative model has the same legislative purpose as the legislative mode of stipulating the gift contract as the practice contract or the essential contract, which is to balance the interests of both parties to the gift contract.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts to analyze and study the system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission, which is summarized as follows:The first part generalizes the system of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission.This paper first briefly expounds the meaning and nature of the system of the donator's right of arbitrary revocation, then introduces the similarities and differences between the donator's right of arbitrary revocation and the relevant legal concepts, and discusses in detail the legal basis and system of the donator's right of arbitrary revocation in advance.In the second part, the author compares and analyzes the legislative models of the right of revocation of the right of donating people at home and abroad, which are mainly divided into two legislative models: one is the system of the right to revoke arbitrarily and the other is the one that does not. The former mainly introduces the civil law of Japan.The latter mainly introduces the legislative models of Roman law, German law and French law, and makes a comparative analysis of the above legislative models.The third part points out the legislative defects of the system of freewill rescission of donators in our country.It includes the lack of necessary restrictions on the exercise of the right of arbitrary rescission, the lack of a mechanism to protect the interests of the grantee, the imperfection of the relevant provisions of contract Law, etc.The fourth part elaborates the legislative suggestion of consummating the system of donator's right of arbitrary rescission in our country.Including restricting the way and duration of the exercise of the donator's right of arbitrary rescission, expanding the scope of the contract which cannot be revoked arbitrarily, stipulating that the subject of the exercise of the right of arbitrary revocation includes the addressee, and establishing a system of compensation for the loss of trust interests of the recipient.To the contract law related clause consummation and so on.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】