当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

民商分立下合伙企业的主体地位研究

发布时间:2018-04-12 06:14

  本文选题:民商分立 + 合伙企业 ; 参考:《中国青年政治学院》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:合伙企业法作为商事组织法的三驾马车之一,在民商法部门中有着特殊的地位。我国既无商法典又无民法典的民商法立法现状下,学者们对于民法与商法关系的讨论激烈,商法的基本概念存在着模糊之处,因此在讨论合伙企业的制度时存在着一些需要澄清的商法基础理论研究上的理论背景问题。 本文第一部分着重解决合伙企业法的基础理论问题,分析合伙企业法中的立法目的和价值理念,以民商分立为指引研究民商法中的主体制度,对比分析民事主体制度与商事主体制度,以此指引合伙企业的私法主体定位。 第二部分从合伙企业的概念和特征入手,考察我国《合伙企业法》规定的合伙企业的商事主体地位,,同时结合《民法通则》、《合同法》、《物权法》等相关法律规定探讨合伙企业的民事主体地位,指出目前我国有关合伙企业立法在民事主体制度与商事主体制度的衔接上存在着解释论上的困境。 第三部分分析合伙企业民事主体地位肯定说中的“法人说”、“次法人说”、“第三类民事主体说”,研究学者在肯定合伙企业民事主体地位前提下,提出的有关合伙企业民商事主体地位进行协调的方案,提出在我国当前立法模式下,不宜改造法人制度以使合伙企业法人化;“次法人说”过于关注商事主体责任形式,不利于民商事主体制度的协调;我国目前在合同法、物权法中均体现出对合伙企业主体地位在民法总则中有突破传统民事主体二元结构的需求,合伙企业应以“其他组织”的地位成为第三类民事主体。
[Abstract]:As one of the troika of commercial organization law, partnership enterprise law has a special position in civil and commercial law department.Under the current situation of civil and commercial law legislation which has neither commercial code nor civil code in our country, scholars have a heated discussion on the relationship between civil law and commercial law, and the basic concepts of commercial law are vague.Therefore, there are some theoretical background problems in the basic theory of commercial law that need to be clarified when discussing the system of partnership.The first part of this paper focuses on solving the basic theoretical problems of the partnership enterprise law, analyzes the legislative purpose and value concept of the partnership enterprise law, and studies the subject system in the civil and commercial law under the guidance of the separation of civil and commercial affairs.This paper compares the civil subject system with the commercial subject system to guide the position of the partnership private law subject.The second part, starting with the concept and characteristics of partnership, investigates the status of the commercial subject of partnership, which is stipulated in the Partnership Enterprise Law of our country.At the same time, it discusses the civil subject status of the partnership enterprise in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, such as "General principles of Civil Law", "contract Law", "property Law", and so on.It is pointed out that there is a dilemma of interpretation in the connection between the civil subject system and the commercial subject system in the relevant partnership legislation in our country at present.The third part analyzes the "legal person theory", "sub-legal person theory" and "the third kind of civil subject theory" in the affirmation of the civil subject status of the partnership enterprise.Under the current legislation mode of our country, it is not appropriate to reform the legal person system to make the partnership enterprise legalized, and the "sub-legal person theory" pays too much attention to the form of commercial subject responsibility.It is unfavorable to the coordination of the civil and commercial subject system. At present, in the contract law and the real right law of our country, there is a need for the partnership subject status to break through the traditional dual structure of civil subject in the general principles of civil law.Partnership should become the third kind of civil subject with the status of "other organization".
【学位授予单位】:中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王荣平;;对德国民法法人制度的借鉴与反思[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年12期

2 刘邓军;;论合伙不应成为独立民事主体[J];重庆社会科学;2005年12期

3 王建文;;从商人到企业:商人制度变革的依据与取向[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年05期

4 夏旭阳;非法人组织的法律地位及其立法模式——兼评《民法(草案)》总则有关条文[J];法学杂志;2005年04期

5 马骏驹,余延满;合伙民事主体地位的再探讨[J];法学评论;1990年03期

6 廖凡;美国非公司型有限责任企业初探[J];法学;2003年09期

7 童航;;《商事通则》:以商人为逻辑起点[J];福建法学;2011年04期

8 申卫星;;中国民法典的品性[J];法学研究;2006年03期

9 张胜先;第三民事主体——非法人组织的立法思考[J];求索;2002年04期

10 徐学鹿;论我国商法的现代化[J];山东法学;1999年02期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 吴晓静;民事法律关系网络论[D];西南政法大学;2008年

2 陶政;商法价值研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年



本文编号:1738509

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1738509.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5ee1a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com