上海盘起诉大连盘起委托合同纠纷案评析

发布时间：2018-05-03 07:41

本文选题：商事委托 + 任意解除权　；参考：《湖南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：商事委托合同的任意解除权行使问题，在理论界与实务界都引起了广泛关注，是学术研究和司法实践中争论的热点问题之一。合同的类型是否为商事委托合同，大连盘起是否享有合同解除权和损失赔偿范围是否仅限于直接损失是上海盘起诉大连盘起委托合同纠纷案中的争议焦点。从定义上分析，商事委托合同和其他类型的合同存在较为明显的区别，结合案件的基本情况，，可以认定上海盘起和大连盘起签订的合同，其性质并非为纯粹的商事委托合同，而是一个包含产品买卖关系的综合性商事委托合同。由于我国采取的是民商合一的立法体系，根据《合同法》第410条的规定，大连盘起当然可以行使任意解除商事委托合同的权利。但是，享有任意解除权并不等于行使权利的行为就一定具有合法性。从任意解除权的限制制度方面来考量，大连盘起行使任意解除权的行为也应当受到一定的规制；从行使权利的目的、时机、方式和效果方面分析，大连盘起的解约行为事实上属于权利的滥用，应受到法律的惩罚。上海盘起是否获得可得利益损失的赔偿取决于合同履行利益的可实现性，每一合同事务的完成，预期都会实现与其阶段相适应的可得利益。上海盘起按照协议在完成了广告代理、市场调查、产品推广和产品营销等部分合同事务后，其因大连盘起解约行为而遭受了损失，应该获得相应赔偿。为了使上海盘起利益得到全面保护，法院在确定损害赔偿范围时，不应该只限定于赔偿直接损失。
[Abstract]:The issue of the exercise of arbitrary rescission of commercial entrustment contract has aroused extensive concern in both theoretical and practical circles and has become one of the hot issues in academic research and judicial practice. Whether the type of contract is a commercial entrustment contract, whether Dalian Pan enjoys the right to terminate the contract and whether the scope of compensation for loss is limited to direct loss is the focus of dispute in Shanghai Pan suing Dalian Panqi entrustment contract dispute. In terms of definition, there are obvious differences between commercial entrustment contracts and other types of contracts. According to the basic circumstances of the cases, it can be concluded that the nature of the contracts signed between Shanghai and Dalian is not pure commercial entrustment contracts. It is a comprehensive commercial entrustment contract that contains the relationship between the sale and purchase of the product. Because our country adopts the legislation system of the integration of civil and commercial affairs, according to the stipulation of Article 410 of contract Law, Dalian Panqi can certainly exercise the right to rescind the commercial entrustment contract arbitrarily. However, to enjoy the right of arbitrary rescission does not mean that the exercise of the right must have legality. Considering from the aspect of restriction system of arbitrary rescission right, the behavior of exercising arbitrary rescission right in Dalian should also be regulated to some extent, and the purpose, timing, method and effect of exercising the right should be analyzed. The abrogation of Dalian's contract is in fact an abuse of rights and should be punished by law. The compensation for the loss of the available benefits depends on the realizability of the contract performance benefits. The completion of each contract is expected to realize the available benefits corresponding to the stage of the contract. After completing some contract matters such as advertising agency, market investigation, product promotion and product marketing, Shanghai Panqi has suffered losses as a result of Dalian disengagement, and should be compensated accordingly. In order to fully protect the interests of Shanghai Panqi, the court should not limit the scope of damages to compensation for direct losses.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】