网络游戏中虚拟财产的民法保护方法
发布时间:2018-05-03 07:37
本文选题:虚拟财产 + 物权 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:自从中国虚拟财产第一案以来,法院受理了大量的关于网络游戏中虚拟财产的争诉,但虚拟财产的法律地位及法律性质在我国目前立法中尚未明确,法官在判决理由中试图通过《民法通则》、《合同法》、《侵权责任法》和《消费者权益保护法》等来理清当事人之间的法律关系以及虚拟财产的法律地位。但是从以往的案例来看,往往还没有一个统一的明确的标准,尤其在证据方面更是给法官的判决增加了难度。理论界对此,尤其是虚拟财产的理论定性方面更是众说纷纭。在虚拟财产性质的研究的发展中,虚拟财产的法律地位越来越被学者所接受,但是对于其性质界定依然存在分歧,虽然众多学者采纳物权说,最高院民一庭的意见中给出利益说,但笔者认为债权说最能够体现虚拟财产的本质。在解决理论困境,完善债权说理论的基础上,通过分析虚拟财产本身的特点、法律价值的利益衡量、举证责任分配和可行性技术手段的角度,,从运营商违反合同义务和第三人侵犯债权两个方面对虚拟财产的保护范围和方法进行类型化的研究。希望给法律在审判实践中以参考。
[Abstract]:Since the first case of virtual property in China, the court has accepted a large number of disputes about virtual property in online games, but the legal status and legal nature of virtual property have not been clearly defined in the legislation of our country at present. The judge tries to clarify the legal relationship between the parties and the legal status of the virtual property by means of "General principles of Civil Law", "contract Law", "Tort liability Law" and "Consumer Rights Protection Law". However, in the past cases, there is often no uniform and clear standard, especially in the case of evidence, which makes the judge's decision more difficult. Theorists have different opinions on this, especially on the qualitative theory of virtual property. In the development of the research on the nature of virtual property, the legal status of virtual property has been accepted by more and more scholars, but there are still differences on the definition of its nature, although many scholars adopt the theory of real right. The opinion of the people's first Court of the Supreme Court gives the theory of interests, but the author thinks that the theory of creditor's rights can best reflect the essence of virtual property. On the basis of solving the theoretical dilemma and perfecting the theory of creditor's rights, through analyzing the characteristics of virtual property itself, the interests of legal value, the distribution of burden of proof and the angle of feasible technical means, This paper studies the protection scope and method of virtual property from two aspects: breach of contract obligation by operator and infringement of creditor's rights by third party. I hope to give the law a reference in the trial practice.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 徐涤宇,刘辉;网络游戏中虚拟财产权利属性之分析——二元模式是否可靠[J];电子知识产权;2005年06期
2 陈岑;论物权的特征——从物权与债权之区别为视角[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2003年03期
3 方新军;;盖尤斯无体物概念的建构与分解[J];法学研究;2006年04期
4 于飞;;侵权法中权利与利益的区分方法[J];法学研究;2011年04期
5 郭胜男;;虚拟财产物权说之我见[J];民营科技;2012年01期
6 尹田;论物权标的之特性[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2003年04期
本文编号:1837597
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1837597.html