债权人撤销权的效力研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 21:01

本文选题：撤销权 + 效力归属　；参考：《西北大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：长期以来,我国立法对债权人的撤销权并没有合理的制度安排。20世纪80年代,我国在制定《民法通则》时也没有规定此制度,人们对债权人撤销权制度依然感到陌生。直到1999年,我国《合同法》的颁布和实施,人们对这一制度才逐渐了解和加以关注,学术界和司法界也将债权人撤销权制度纳入研究和实践范围之内。然而,与国外已经发展几十年甚至几百年的法律规定相比,我国《合同法》对债权人撤销权规定的内容过于简略,没有形成一个完整的、体系化的制度。随着我国市场经济的不断深化,关于债权人撤销权效力问题的不足和缺陷已日趋明显化。首先,学术界对债权人撤销权的性质依然存在很多争论,且法律对其也没有明确的规定,导致法院在实施过程中无所适从,债权人撤销权的效力因性质的不同导致效力归属截然不同；其次,对债权人撤销权的效力归属没有明确合理的制度,给法律的运用带来了诸多困难；再者,关于债权人撤销权的行使期间和范围的规定也模棱两可,导致司法实践中出现了不同的判决。因此,为了更加明确债权人撤销权的效力归属问题,本文首先从债权人撤销权的概念及其性质着手,通过对学界观点的分析,以确定本文的研究对象及研究方向。其次对债权人撤销权的效力分类进行论述,以求将其效力归属更加明晰化。最后给出本文观点,并对我国在将来的立法和司法过程给予合理的建议。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the legislation of our country has no reasonable system arrangement for the creditor's right of rescission. In the 1980s, our country did not stipulate this system when we formulated the General principles of Civil Law, and people still feel strange about the system of creditor's right of rescission. Until 1999, with the promulgation and implementation of contract Law in China, people gradually understood and paid attention to this system, and the academic and judicial circles also brought the system of rescission right of creditors into the scope of research and practice. However, compared with the legal provisions that have been developed for several decades or even hundreds of years abroad, the contents of the provisions on the revocation rights of creditors in China's contract Law are too brief and do not form a complete and systematic system. With the deepening of market economy in our country, the deficiency and defect about the effect of creditor's right of rescission have become more and more obvious. First of all, there is still a lot of controversy about the nature of the creditor's right of rescission in the academic circles, and there is no clear stipulation on it in the law, which results in the court being at a loss in the process of implementation. The validity of the creditor's right of rescission is very different because of its different nature. Secondly, there is no clear and reasonable system for the validity of the creditor's right of rescission, which brings many difficulties to the application of the law. The provisions on the exercise period and scope of the creditor's right of rescission are ambiguous, resulting in different judgments in judicial practice. Therefore, in order to clarify the validity attribution of creditor's right of rescission, this paper begins with the concept and nature of creditor's right of rescission, through the analysis of academic point of view, to determine the research object and research direction of this paper. Secondly, the validity classification of creditor's right of rescission is discussed in order to make its validity more clear. Finally, this paper gives the views of this paper, and gives some reasonable suggestions on the future legislative and judicial process of our country.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】