当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

旅游合同任意解除权研究

发布时间:2018-05-04 01:12

  本文选题:旅游合同 + 任意解除权 ; 参考:《浙江大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着我国旅游业的快速发展,旅游活动日益增多,但旅游相关立法的缺失,引发了旅游纠纷的不断升级,尤其是对旅游者解除合同而引发的相关问题亦成了纠纷发生的火药桶。在《旅游法》立法之际,本文试通过对旅游合同任意解除权的相关问题进行探讨,进而对在我国构建旅游合同任意解除权提出了一些立法建议。 在章节编排上,本文除引言和结语部分外,正文共分为三部分: 首先是引言部分,提出了本文研究的背景、目的和意义。 第一部分介绍我国旅游合同任意解除权的现状分析。主要存在两方面的困境:一是旅游合同任意解除权立法的困境;二是司法裁判对旅游合同解除问题的法律适用困惑,以此引发对构建旅游合同任意解除权的思考。 第二部分介绍构建旅游合同任意解除权的理论基础。主要包括以下三方面:一是厘清任意解除权的界定和法理基础,明确了任意解除权和一般解除权之间的关系;二是分析了构建旅游合同任意解除权的必要性,既是由旅游合同的特殊性决定的,也有利于合同法基本价值的实现;三是分析了构建旅游合同任意解除权的可行性,既考察了德国、日本和我国台湾地区的相关立法,又汲取了民法典草案中学者立法建议的精华。 第三部分介绍了构建旅游合同任意解除权的法律规制。对于一般规制而言,必须厘清旅游合同任意解除权的行使主体、存续期间、行使方式和行使后的协助义务;对于特殊规制而言,分别从该任意解除权是否可以特别约定抛弃和损害赔偿的性质、范围进行了具体探讨,从而为旅游合同任意解除权的行使提供了较为完善的理论体系。 最后是结语部分,通过对全文主要观点的描述,对本文的研究结论进行了概括。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of tourism in China, tourism activities are increasing day by day, but the lack of relevant legislation on tourism has led to the continuous escalation of tourism disputes, especially the related problems caused by the cancellation of contracts for tourists. At the time of the legislation of "Tourism Law", this paper tries to probe into the related problems of the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract, and then puts forward some legislative suggestions on the construction of the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract in our country. In the chapter arrangement, the text is divided into three parts except the introduction and the conclusion. The first part is the introduction, which puts forward the background, purpose and significance of this paper. The first part introduces the current situation of the right to rescind the tourism contract in China. There are two main dilemmas: one is the dilemma of the legislation of the right of arbitrary rescission of the tourism contract; the other is the confusion of the application of the law to the issue of the termination of the tourism contract, which leads to the thinking on the construction of the right of arbitrary cancellation of the tourism contract. The second part introduces the theoretical basis of the construction of the right of arbitrary cancellation of tourism contract. It mainly includes the following three aspects: first, it clarifies the definition and legal basis of the right of arbitrary rescission, clarifies the relationship between the right of arbitrary rescission and the right of general rescission; secondly, it analyzes the necessity of constructing the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract. It is determined not only by the particularity of tourism contract, but also conducive to the realization of the basic value of contract law. Thirdly, it analyzes the feasibility of constructing the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract, which not only examines the relevant legislation in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, but also helps to realize the basic value of contract law. It also draws on the essence of the scholars'legislative suggestions in the draft Civil Code. The third part introduces the legal regulation of the construction of the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract. For general regulation, it is necessary to clarify the main body, the mode of exercise and the obligation of assistance after the exercise of the right of arbitrary rescission of the tourism contract. In this paper, the author discusses the nature and scope of abandonment and damages from the perspective of whether the right of arbitrary rescission can be specially agreed upon, thus providing a more perfect theoretical system for the exercise of the right of arbitrary rescission of tourism contract. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is summarized by describing the main points of the paper.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 申海恩;;旅游合同中尚未实际发生的费用及其计算[J];法学杂志;2011年06期

2 吕巧珍;;委托合同中任意解除权的限制[J];法学;2006年09期

3 杨富斌;;略论我国旅游法制建设的重要里程碑[J];法学杂志;2011年06期

4 王珊珊;刘燕婷;;浅谈旅游合同的解除[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2011年06期

5 崔建远;龙俊;;委托合同的任意解除权及其限制——“上海盘起诉盘起工业案”判决的评释[J];法学研究;2008年06期

6 龚卫东;;论格式旅游合同的法律规制[J];乐山师范学院学报;2010年03期

7 汤治;;民法解释在处理旅游合同纠纷中的作用——以孟元诉中佳旅行社旅游合同纠纷案为例[J];旅游科学;2010年06期

8 张琰;对旅游格式合同规制问题的探讨[J];旅游学刊;2004年03期

9 周江洪;;旅游合同性质决定之局限性探讨——以日本的学说及裁判实践为例[J];旅游学刊;2009年11期

10 王玉松;;情势变更原则在旅游合同中的应用[J];旅游学刊;2009年12期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 王泉泉;论委托合同任意解除权及其限制[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 刘兆莲;任意解除权研究[D];清华大学;2006年

3 李婷;旅游合同之任意解除权研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年



本文编号:1840916

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1840916.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8852d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com