纯经济上损失及其赔偿制度浅析
发布时间:2018-05-04 21:38
本文选题:纯经济上损失 + 赔偿制度 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:纯经济上损失是随着经济形势和法律形势的发展在实践中逐步确立的法律概念,与人身权和财产权的伤害不同,纯经济上损失是指直接遭受的非财产或人身的不利益,在大陆法系和英美法系上都有使用,是在突破传统法律概念中顺应经济发展建立的法律概念。 在英美法系中,因合同的“相对性”原则,很大一部分经济上损失的救济由侵权法加以规定,法律实务中法官通过对“注意义务”判断标准的创制,发展出许多新的案例类型来救济受有纯经济损失的当事人,如不实陈述案等。而大陆法系的法国法和德国法,则通过扩展适用合同法,如附随义务、事实合同、附保护第三人利益合同、社会生活安全注意义务等,从而使纯经济上损失获得赔偿。 笔者认为,因纯经济上损失的概念和界定仍处于研究阶段,我国并不必须引入这一概念。对已有明确法律规定的,继续按照现有规则执行。而其他未明确法律保护规则的,则设计类型化的保护方式加以保护。另外也可通过最高院的司法解释和相关个案批复形成类型化案件的处理参照。对纯经济上损失保护的同时也要对其进行一定的限制,使其在赔偿与保护之间达到相对合理的平衡。
[Abstract]:Pure economic loss is a legal concept that has been gradually established in practice with the development of economic situation and legal situation. It is different from the injury of personal right and property right. Pure economic loss refers to the non-property or personal disinterest suffered directly. It is used in both the civil law system and the common law system. It is a legal concept established in accordance with the economic development in breaking through the traditional concept of law. In Anglo-American law system, due to the principle of "relativity" of contract, a large part of the relief of economic loss is stipulated by tort law. In legal practice, the judge creates the criterion of "duty of care". Many new types of cases have been developed to remedy parties who have suffered pure economic losses, such as false statements. The French law and German law of the continental law system are extended to apply the contract law, such as collateral obligation, factual contract, contract to protect the interests of the third party, the duty of care in social life and so on, so that the pure economic loss can be compensated. The author thinks that since the concept and definition of pure economic loss is still in the research stage, China does not have to introduce this concept. Where there is a clear legal provision, it shall continue to be implemented in accordance with the existing rules. But other not clear legal protection rule, then designs the type protection way to protect. In addition, we can use the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court and the approval of relevant cases to form a reference for the handling of typed cases. At the same time, it is necessary to restrict the pure economic loss protection so as to achieve a relatively reasonable balance between compensation and protection.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 龚赛红;;中国民法视野中的纯经济损失——兼评我国的研究现状[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
2 李昊;论英美侵权法中过失引起的纯经济上损失的赔偿规则[J];比较法研究;2005年05期
3 张新宝;张小义;;论纯粹经济损失的几个基本问题[J];法学杂志;2007年04期
4 彭惠连;周小祺;;纯粹经济损失初探[J];法制与社会;2007年04期
5 边奕冰;;我国纯经济损失赔偿制度之构建[J];法制与社会;2011年14期
,本文编号:1844749
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1844749.html