当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

数据库法律保护模式的构建

发布时间:2018-05-06 06:03

  本文选题:数据库 + 版权保护 ; 参考:《山东大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:在信息技术高速发展的当今社会,数据库作为知识产品,无论是在设计、制作还是在推广、传播过程中,都需要付出巨大的努力、投入高额的成本,这就需要从法律上确定严格的标准与尺度来进行相应的保护,从而对制作者在该领域的积极性予以充足的保障,以此来促使更多的社会关注投入到该领域中,集中优势力量,进而推动该行业的全面性进步。然而,伴随着网络科技的飞速发展,社会生活的方方面面在取得重大进步的同时,一系列的负面性效应也逐渐地显现出来,带来了不小的社会负担。在数据库领域,侵权形式日渐多样化,除了传统形式外,新兴的网络侵权造成了异常严重的后果。而且,科技的发展也使侵权的简捷性日渐凸显,传统形式的侵权需要耗费一定的时间、成本等,而网络侵权则不然,造成的后果也比传统侵权更加严重。同时,伴随着信息技术的蓬勃发展,数据库也发挥着越来越重要的作用,不仅经济上,而且政治、文化生活上都需要数据库的应用,在信息产业中占据着举足轻重的地位。然而,关于数据库保护的法律资源存在着明显的不足,我国对该领域没有设计出明确的法律制度,国际上至今也无法达成统一性的标准与规则。因此,应当采取何种模式来全面而完善的保护数据库同时须在相关各方之间达致均衡局面已成为困扰国内外法学界的难题。因此,本文决定对现今流行的各种法律保护模式逐一分析,找出各自的优势与缺陷,从而构建出符合我国国情的法律保护模式。 本文共分为五部分:第一部分是对数据库的基本概述,介绍了数据库的定义、特征以及分类,论述了数据库法律保护的必要性,并且简单地分析了当前流行的各种保护模式;第二部分从版权保护的角度出发,介绍了版权保护的立法现状、特征和内容,并对其进行了详细的评析,指出相应的优势与缺陷,从而彻底地认清版权保护;第三部分论述了数据库的特殊权利保护,简要介绍了欧盟、美国的立法历程,分析了其基本内容以及优缺点,从而对该种模式有一个初步的了解;第四部分讨论了现今具有实际操作意义的其他几种保护模式,包括反不正当竞争法、合同法以及技术措施保护等,对这三种模式做了简单的介绍和评析。总之,上述各种模式都存在相应的优势与缺陷,在现今复杂而多变的社会背景下,单靠其中的一种是不可能完成保护任务的;第五部分从我国的实际情况出发,介绍了现今的数据库产业现状与法律保护现状,强调须在利益平衡机制的规制下完善相关的法律保护制度,只有将各种保护模式有机结合起来,面对不同情况采取不同的模式,才能实现整个行业的全面进步。
[Abstract]:In today's society with the rapid development of information technology, databases, as knowledge products, need great efforts and high cost in the process of design, manufacture, promotion and dissemination. It is necessary to establish strict standards and standards from a legal point of view in order to protect them accordingly, so as to ensure the enthusiasm of the producers in this field, so as to encourage more social attention to be devoted to the field and to concentrate on the advantages. And then promote the overall progress of the industry. However, with the rapid development of network science and technology, many aspects of social life have made great progress, at the same time, a series of negative effects have gradually appeared, which has brought not small social burden. In the field of database, the forms of infringement are becoming more and more diverse. Besides the traditional forms, the emerging network infringement has caused serious consequences. Moreover, the development of science and technology also makes the infringement of simplicity increasingly prominent, the traditional form of infringement needs to spend a certain amount of time, cost and so on, but the network infringement is not, the consequences are more serious than the traditional infringement. At the same time, with the vigorous development of information technology, database also plays a more and more important role, not only in economy, but also in political and cultural life. It plays an important role in the information industry. However, there are obvious deficiencies in the legal resources of database protection. Our country has not designed a clear legal system in this field, and has not been able to reach a unified standard and rules in the world. Therefore, what kind of model should be adopted to protect the database comprehensively and perfectly at the same time to achieve a balanced situation among the relevant parties has become a difficult problem for the domestic and foreign legal circles. Therefore, this paper decides to analyze each popular legal protection mode one by one, find out their advantages and disadvantages, and construct a legal protection model which is in line with the national conditions of our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the basic overview of the database, introduces the definition, characteristics and classification of the database, discusses the necessity of the legal protection of database, and simply analyzes the current popular protection models; The second part introduces the legislation status, characteristics and contents of copyright protection from the perspective of copyright protection, and makes a detailed analysis of it, pointing out the corresponding advantages and disadvantages, so as to thoroughly recognize copyright protection; The third part discusses the protection of special rights in database, briefly introduces the legislative process of EU and USA, analyzes its basic content, advantages and disadvantages, and thus has a preliminary understanding of this model; The fourth part discusses several other protection models which have practical significance, including anti-unfair competition law, contract law and the protection of technical measures, and makes a brief introduction and evaluation of these three models. In short, each of the above models has its own advantages and disadvantages. In the present complex and changeable social background, it is impossible to complete the task of protection by relying on one of them alone. The fifth part proceeds from the actual situation in our country. This paper introduces the present situation of database industry and legal protection, and emphasizes the need to perfect the relevant legal protection system under the regulation of interest balance mechanism. Only by organically combining all kinds of protection models, we should adopt different models in the face of different situations. In order to achieve the overall progress of the industry.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李雅琴;;从《欧盟数据库指令》谈中国数据库立法设想[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2008年12期

2 刘秀臣;论数据库的法律保护[J];当代法学;2001年02期

3 龚佳;试论对非独创性数据库的法律保护[J];当代法学;2002年03期

4 沈晖;无独创性数据库法律保护浅论[J];当代法学;2003年06期

5 于海防;姜沣格;;数据库的法律保护体系分析[J];当代法学;2007年02期

6 陈佳强;;数据库法律保护的困境与出路[J];电子科技大学学报(社科版);2008年02期

7 李扬;试论数据库的法律保护[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2002年01期

8 李扬;数据库特殊权利保护制度的缺陷及立法完善[J];法商研究;2003年04期

9 许春明;论数据库的版权保护[J];法学杂志;2002年04期

10 沈艳阳;;论数据库的法律保护模式[J];法制与社会;2007年06期



本文编号:1851087

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1851087.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户34050***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com