当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

无权处分的效力问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-06 15:58

  本文选题:无权处分 + 善意取得 ; 参考:《西北大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国民法学界对于《合同法》第五十一条规定的无权处分行为的效力问题存在着极大的争议。本文首先从各个理论关于无权处分概念的界定有所不同出发,在对无权处分不同概念的理解基础之上,形成了世界上不同的物权变动模式,一是债权意思主义的物权变动模式,二是物权形式主义的物权变动模式,三是债权形式主义的物权变动模式。对这些不同的物权变动模式通过比较法的研究,得出我国立法上坚持选择债权形式主义的物权变动模式,在这一前提下,分析我国关于无权处分行为效力的各个学说,以证明在无权处分情况下之债权合同有效所具有的优越性,从而提出本文的观点:我国无权处分的效力是在坚持债权形式主义的物权变动模式下债权合同的有效,以使无权处分制度发挥其本来应有的功能。另外,无权处分不仅是合同法上的争议问题,同时也涉及物权法上的善意取得制度。本文从无权处分和善意取得制度之间互相协调的角度,论证了债权合同有效以及交付或者登记行为的公示公信力应该为协调两者关系的关键,并据此认为善意取得的性质应为继受取得。
[Abstract]:There are great disputes in the civil law circles of our country about the validity of the unauthorized disposition of the fifty-first provisions of the contract law. Firstly, this article begins with the different definitions of the concept of unauthorized disposition, and forms the different mode of real right change in the world on the basis of the understanding of the different concepts of the unauthorized disposition. The two is the change mode of real right in real right formalism, and the three is the change mode of the right of claim formalism, and the study of these different modes of real right change through the comparative law shows that the mode of the change of real right of the creditor's rights formalism is chosen in the legislation of our country, and on this premise, the analysis of me The various doctrines on the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition to prove the superiority of the validity of the creditor's right contract under the circumstances of the unauthorized disposition, thus put forward the view of this article that the validity of the unauthorized disposition in our country is to make the system of the unauthorized disposition the validity of the creditor's right in the mode of the change of the right of right in the form of the formalism of the creditor's rights. In addition, the unauthorized disposition is not only a dispute on the law of the contract, but also the good faith acquisition system in the property law. From the angle of coordination between the unauthorized disposition and the bona fide acquisition system, this paper demonstrates that the public credibility of the validity of the contract and the act of delivery or registration should be the key to the coordination of the relationship between the two. According to this, the nature of bona fide acquisition should be acquired.

【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 李琴声;论无权处分[J];当代法学;2003年04期

2 孙宪忠;物权行为理论探源及其意义[J];法学研究;1996年03期

3 崔建远;无权处分辨——合同法第51条规定的解释与适用[J];法学研究;2003年01期

4 吴国U,

本文编号:1852944


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1852944.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户08423***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com