当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

从保理制度探究债权让与规范的新模式

发布时间:2018-05-09 08:34

  本文选题:保理 + 债权让与 ; 参考:《山东大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:保理作为新型债权让与融资类型,其与传统的债权让与制度并不完全一致。从最初的催收账款服务保理到现在的隐蔽性保理、有追索权保理,保理业务种类也在不断创新、发展。然而,实务的创新性和法律的滞后性必然会导致司法实践中的漏洞百出,保理也不例外。我国法院对保理的性质、保理的效力以及将来债权让与等问题的处理一般都仅能依据《民法通则》或《合同法》之规定,此类案件审判结果通常较为死板,并不能对保理行业的发展起到有效的促进作用。因此,解决新型保理业务与法律滞后性之间的冲突就成了保理问题研究的关键。本文主要通过对保理性质和存在的问题的分析,提出对保理债权让与进行登记的管理模式。文章第一部分,先从保理的概念出发,分析两类较为特殊的保理业务类型,进而总结出保理的优势和法律性质,认定保理属于一种新型的债权让与。第二部分,关于保理业务中将来债权让与问题,从比较法和保理司法审判实践两个角度,认定现今的保理业务应当在制度层面适当开放将来债权让与,即只要将来债权是有合理期待或"可鉴别"的,就应当可以作为保理业务的客体。第三部分,是本文的重点,即保理债权让与对债务人的效力以及对第三人的效力的分析。关于保理债权让与对债务人的效力,让与通知对抗原则更为合理,我国也采纳了这种观点;而保理债权让与对第三人的效力方面,主要通过对日本、美国等适用登记对抗制度的国家债权让与制度的分析,得出登记对抗制度的优势,为保理业务适用债权让与登记制度的观点提供实践支撑。第四部分以天津试点区域为例,介绍国内适用保理债权让与登记制度的实例,提出债权让与登记制度在我国也是可行的。第五部分,通过分析前文内容,总结出保理登记对抗制度的优劣势,进而为我国保理债权让与登记制度建设提出符合我国国情的制度设计,以解决我国保理业务中将来债权让与问题以及债权让与对抗第三人效力难以确定的问题。总之,保理作为新兴的债权融资类型,仍处在发展、完善的阶段,只有为其设立健全、合理的登记机制,才能最大程度发挥其效能,保障保理行业的健康运营。
[Abstract]:Factoring, as a new type of creditor's rights transfer financing, is not completely consistent with the traditional creditor's rights transfer system. From the initial collection of account service factoring to the current hidden factoring, there is recourse factoring, factoring business types are constantly innovation and development. However, the innovation of practice and the lag of law will inevitably lead to defects in judicial practice, factoring is no exception. The nature of factoring, the validity of factoring and the assignment of creditor's rights in the future can only be dealt with according to the provisions of General principles of Civil Law or contract Law, and the trial results of such cases are usually rather rigid. Can not play an effective role in promoting the development of factoring industry. Therefore, resolving the conflict between new factoring business and legal lag becomes the key of factoring research. Based on the analysis of the nature and problems of factoring, this paper puts forward the management mode of registration of the assignment of factoring creditor's rights. In the first part of the article, the author analyzes two special types of factoring business from the concept of factoring, then summarizes the advantages and legal nature of factoring, and concludes that factoring belongs to a new type of assignment of creditor's rights. The second part, on the issue of future assignment of creditor's rights in factoring business, from the perspective of comparative law and judicial trial practice of factoring, it concludes that today's factoring business should properly open up the assignment of future creditor's rights at the system level. That is, as long as the creditor's rights in the future are reasonably expected or identifiable, they should be regarded as the object of factoring business. The third part is the emphasis of this paper, namely, the effect of factoring creditor's right to debtor and the third party. With regard to the validity of the assignment of factoring creditor's rights to the debtor, the principle of adversarial notice of assignment is more reasonable, and our country has adopted this view, while the effect of the transfer of factoring claims on third parties is mainly through Japan. Based on the analysis of the national creditor's rights transfer system applicable to the registration confrontation system in the United States, the advantages of the registration confrontation system are obtained, which provide practical support for the viewpoint of applying the creditor's rights assignment and registration system to the factoring business. The fourth part takes Tianjin pilot area as an example, introduces the domestic application of factoring creditor's rights transfer registration system, and points out that the creditor's rights transfer registration system is also feasible in our country. The fifth part, through the analysis of the previous contents, summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of factoring registration confrontation system, and then puts forward the system design in accordance with the national conditions for the construction of factoring creditor's rights transfer and registration system. In order to solve the problem of future assignment of creditor's rights in factoring business in our country and the problem that the validity of assignment of creditor's rights against third parties is difficult to determine. In short, factoring, as a new type of creditor's rights financing, is still in the stage of development and perfection. Only by establishing a sound and reasonable registration mechanism for factoring, can the efficiency of factoring be maximized and the healthy operation of factoring industry be guaranteed.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.6

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 苏兆勇;何惠莹;;论债权让与的生效[J];当代经理人;2006年15期

2 张良;;完善我国债权让与制度的思考[J];中州学刊;2006年05期

3 肖婉珍;;对债权让与制度若干问题的探讨[J];河北经贸大学学报(综合版);2007年04期

4 孙茜;;将来债权让与可行性分析[J];法制与社会;2008年23期

5 黄小育;;我国债权让与制度的完善[J];行政与法;2009年12期

6 胡雨春;曹宇;;论债权让与通知的效力——兼对债权让与通知传统理论的反思[J];法制与社会;2010年18期

7 李艳斐;;债权让与通知若干法律问题之我见[J];法制与社会;2010年26期

8 裴丽萍;论债权让与的若干基本问题[J];中国法学;1995年06期

9 夏恒信,卢俊山,冯继华;论债权让与若干问题[J];山东审判;1998年05期

10 汪传才;论债权让与的通知[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年03期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 李宇;;债权让与和债权质押制度的统一[A];2014年第五届全国民商法学博士生学术论坛论文摘要集[C];2014年

2 申建平;;债权让与制度之历史演进[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪外国刑事法律的理论与实践[C];2005年

相关重要报纸文章 前7条

1 姜春玲;债权让与各方当事人利益平衡之我见[N];江苏法制报;2006年

2 林劲标邋凌蔚 游春亮;出庭也是债权让与通知方式[N];法制日报;2008年

3 中国政法大学民商经济法学院 赵廉慧;债权让与禁止之约定的效力[N];人民法院报;2008年

4 钱利芳;债权让与了 受让人应该还债[N];江苏经济报;2006年

5 案例编写人 重庆市巫山县人民法院 蒋家富;普通提货单转让的法律属性系债权让与[N];人民法院报;2010年

6 朱大伦;债权让与应当由让与人通知债务人[N];人民法院报;2007年

7 马串莲;债务人能否自愿向债权受让人清偿债务[N];人民法院报;2002年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 申建平;债权让与制度研究[D];厦门大学;2006年

2 杨骥;论保理业务对传统债权让与理论的冲击和变革[D];湖南大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 朱浩杰;论债权让与通知的效力[D];华东政法大学;2008年

2 吕洪成;债权让与制度研究[D];重庆大学;2008年

3 吴鑫磊;债权让与之法律结构[D];西南政法大学;2009年

4 陈坤;论债权让与制度中的通知[D];中国政法大学;2010年

5 余崇顺;债权让与制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年

6 曾海峰;债权让与制度研究[D];南昌大学;2011年

7 孙杰;“熟人社会”背景下债权让与中的主张力减弱现象观察[D];山东大学;2011年

8 郑远园;实务中的债权让与制度[D];华东政法大学;2012年

9 夏斌;债权让与公示问题研究[D];暨南大学;2014年

10 丁洁心;债权双重让与之法效果研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年



本文编号:1865310

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1865310.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e5aaa***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com