产品自身损害赔偿研究——兼评《侵权责任法》第41条

发布时间：2018-05-18 05:08

本文选题：缺陷产品 + 自身损害　；参考：《河北法学》2014年11期

【摘要】：产品责任的损害赔偿范畴一直处于不断发展之中,我国《侵权责任法》第41条对其进行了扩张,将产品自身损害也包括在其中,受害人可依据侵权法而非合同法获得产品自损赔偿,从而改变了《产品质量法》排除产品自身损害侵权法救济的做法。因我国责任竞合规则有局限性,要求具有合同关系也存在弊端,而产品致害侵害的是财产权而非财产权指向的对象,故产品自损的侵权法救济存在合理性。其他国家不同程度地允许产品自损的侵权法救济也印证了《侵权责任法》对损害赔偿范畴扩张的合理性,而我国法院对产品自身损害案件判决的多元化使统一产品自身损害救济的原则和标准显得紧迫。产品自损可获得侵权法救济的标准是产品以危及人身、财产安全的方式导致产品自身损害,《侵权责任法》为法院判决扩张损害赔偿提供了法律依据。
[Abstract]:The category of damage compensation for product liability has been developing continuously. Article 41 of our country's Tort liability Law has expanded it to include the damage of the product itself. According to the tort law instead of the contract law, the victim can obtain the compensation for the product's own loss, thus changing the way that the product quality law excludes the remedy of the product's own damage tort law. Because of the limitation of the rules of liability concurrence in our country and the malpractice in the requirement of contract relationship, the infringement of product damage is the object of property right, not the object of property right, so the remedy of tort law of product self-damage is reasonable. In other countries, the tort law relief that allows the product to damage itself to varying degrees also confirms the rationality of the expansion of the scope of damage compensation by the Tort liability Law. However, the diversification of court judgment on product itself makes it urgent to unify the principle and standard of product damage relief. The standard of product self-damage is that the product damages itself in a way that endangers the person and property safety. The Tort liability Law provides a legal basis for the court to decide the compensation for expansion damage.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题《产品自身损害赔偿研究》(13SFB3027)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】