动产交付规则的解释与适用

发布时间：2018-05-24 19:05

本文选题：交付 + 公示方式　；参考：《政法论坛》2008年06期

【摘要】：交付在物权法上和合同法上的法律意义不同,在物权法中交付是物权变动的一种公示方式,指示交付、占有改定不应规定为公示方式;而在合同法中的交付只是合同的履行行为,无论是现实交付还是观念交付均无不妥。现实交付在占有移转时生效,观念交付随意思表示的生效而生效。物权法第23条中的"法律另有规定"的情形有4种,不包括合同法第133条"当事人的约定"在内。准不动产物权变动有交付和登记两种公示方式,占有与登记不一致时以登记为准,但登记权利人恶意的除外;其物权的设立和转让自交付时发生效力,其物权的变更、消灭,应当予以登记;登记权利人处分其物权的行为不适用善意取得制度。
[Abstract]:Delivery in real right law and contract law in the legal meaning is different, in the real right law delivery is a kind of real right change public way, instructs the delivery, the possession change should not be stipulated as the public display way; The delivery in contract law is only the performance of the contract, whether the actual delivery or the concept of delivery are not inappropriate. The actual delivery takes effect in the transfer of possession, and the concept delivery takes effect with the effect of the expression of intention. There are four kinds of cases in Article 23 of Real right Law, excluding Article 133 of contract Law, "Agreement of the parties". There are two modes of public display for the alteration of real right of quasi-immovable property: delivery and registration. Registration shall prevail in case of inconsistency between possession and registration, except in the case of malice on the part of the registered right holder; the establishment and transfer of the property right shall take effect from the time of delivery, and the change and elimination of the real right shall be effected. It should be registered and the bona fide acquisition system should not be applied to the registration of the right holder's disposition of his real right.
【作者单位】：湖南大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的教育部人文社会科学项目“物权公示制度研究(02JD820002)”中期研究成果 “教育部新世纪创新人才支持计划”的支持
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】