足球合同中单边续约选择条款的合法性问题——来自格雷米奥案的启示

发布时间：2018-06-07 20:11

本文选题：球员合同 + 单边续约条款　；参考：《天津体育学院学报》2015年06期

【摘要】：单边续约条款与保留条款、选择条款一样是球员运动生命的控制机制,在性质是合同上的形成权,具有拘束球员意思自治的法效果,因而常因违反国际足联规则的基本原则而被认定无效。然而,格雷米奥案是最近的一起国际体育仲裁院裁定单边续约条款具有合法性的案例,本案的法律推理过程,重申了国际体育仲裁院在单边选择条款合法性判断上的个案审查义务,凸显其审慎地维持着合同稳定性与球员自由流动之间的平衡。本案的裁决产生了戏剧性效果:俱乐部虽然赢得了在单边续约选择条款合法性判断上的支持,但是却未因此获得任何违约赔偿,成为一场零和游戏。本案带给俱乐部、球员和足球主管机构的启示是,当事人应当严格按照国际足联规则所确定的合同法基本原则行事,足球主管机构应摒弃在标准球员合同中使用单边续约选择条款,同时注意对破坏合同稳定性的行为进行体育制裁。
[Abstract]:The unilateral contract renewal clause and the reservation clause and the choice clause are the control mechanism of the player's sports life, and the nature is the formation right of the contract, which has the legal effect of binding the player's autonomy of the will. As a result, it is often found null and void for violating the basic principles of FIFA rules. However, the Grameo case is a recent case in which the International Court of Sports Arbitration has ruled that unilateral contract renewal clauses are legitimate, the legal reasoning process of the case. It restates the case review obligation of the International Sports Arbitration Court in judging the legality of unilateral selection clause, which highlights the balance between the stability of the contract and the free flow of players. The ruling in this case has had a dramatic effect: the club has won support for the legality of the unilateral renewal option, but has not received any damages for breach of contract, becoming a zero-sum game. The revelation of the case to clubs, players and football authorities is that the parties should act strictly in accordance with the basic principles of contract law established by FIFA rules, Football authorities should abandon the use of unilateral contract renewal clauses in standard players' contracts and pay attention to sports sanctions for acts that undermine the stability of contracts.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：G80-05

【参考文献】