在合同领域中适用惩罚性赔偿制度的法律研究
本文选题:惩罚性赔偿 + 合同领域 ; 参考:《广西师范大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:惩罚性赔偿制度这一制度是源于英美法系,在英国、美国中运用的较广泛。至今已有二百多年的历史。虽然惩罚性赔偿制度在英美法系的国家中有较大的争议,但是不能否认的是惩罚性赔偿制度在英美法系的国家中发挥了重要的作用,特别是在合同也发挥了较大的作用。大陆法系的国家对合同中适用惩罚性赔偿制度一直存在着争议,惩罚性赔偿制度在大陆法系的国家或地区使用的较少,但英美法系国家惩罚性赔偿制度在合同中有较为广泛的运用,并取得了较大的效果。本文探究将惩罚性赔偿制度沿用到我国的合同领域中。本文根据惩罚性赔偿的制度的功能、价值,并结合我国合同领域内惩罚性赔偿制度的现状对惩罚性赔偿制度进行了评析,然后提出了针对性的建议,以力求完善我国合同领域内的惩罚性赔偿制度。具体而言,全文分为五个部分。本文的引言部分阐述了惩罚性赔偿制度在英美法系国家中使用较为广泛,在大陆法系的国家或地区中惩罚性赔偿这一制度也开始逐渐的适用,并且在合同领域内适用惩罚性赔偿制度是大势所趋,具有较为深远的意义。本文的第一部分“惩罚性赔偿制度的概述”,该部分首先对惩罚性赔偿制度进行了定义,并论述了惩罚性赔偿制度的特征,其次,还探究了惩罚性赔偿制度的功能,再次还探究了惩罚性赔偿制度与补偿性赔偿制度,二者的联系与区别。最后还初步探讨了侵权惩罚性赔偿制度和合同惩罚性赔偿制度的关系,二者的联系与区别。从中我们可以看出,惩罚性赔偿制度有其自身的一些特点,惩罚性赔偿制度与补偿性赔偿制度二者之间存在着紧密的联系。本文的第二部分“惩罚性赔偿制度的理论基础”,该部分探讨了惩罚性赔偿制度的价值;惩罚性赔偿制度与合同法相关原则的争议;惩罚性赔偿制度在合同领域内适用的各种学说;最后得出惩罚性赔偿制度在合同领域内适用之我的看法。惩罚性赔偿制度引入到合同中,存在着一定的争议,主要争议的焦点是合同法是私法,惩罚性赔偿制度带有一定的公法色彩,将惩罚性赔偿制度引入到合同中,对合同进行调整,惩处的力度较大,不利于市场经济的有序进行。在此部分中笔者对惩罚性赔偿制度进行了一系列的分析和探讨,最后得出了自己的看法。本文的第三部分“惩罚性赔偿制度的比较分析”,该部分先是对我国古代和近代中的惩罚性赔偿制度进行了探析,然后是对英美法系典型的国家即英国、美国;大陆法系典型的国家或地区即德国、台湾地区惩罚性赔偿制度在合同领域内的适用进行了初步的探析。最后得出国外的国家或地区在合同领域内适用惩罚性赔偿制度对我国的启示。笔者认为对其他国家或地区合同领域内适用惩罚性赔偿制度进行初步探讨,对我国具有一定的借鉴意义。本文的第四部分“合同领域中适用惩罚性赔偿制度的立法现状及实施的可行性与必要性”,该部分先是对我国现在合同领域内惩罚性赔偿制度的立法现状进行了探讨和分析,然后对在我国合同领域内建立惩罚性赔偿制度的可行性和必要性进行了一系列的探讨和评析。本文的第五部分“完善我国合同领域中适用的惩罚性赔偿制度”,该部分是笔者对我国合同领域内惩罚性赔偿制度的完善提出了自己的一些建议。主要是从惩罚性赔偿制度的适用范围、适用条件、赔偿数额、司法程序这几个方面提出了自己的一些看法。本文最后为“结语”部分,现阶段惩罚性赔偿制度在合同领域的适用存在着一些缺陷,但惩罚性赔偿制度在我国合同领域内的适用有一定的可行性和必要性,我国有必要从适用范围,适用条件,赔偿数额,司法程序这几个方面对合同领域内的惩罚性赔偿制度进行完善和发展。
[Abstract]:The system of punitive damages is derived from the common law system, in the United Kingdom and in the United States. It has been more than 200 years old. Although the punitive damages system has great controversy in the countries of Anglo American law system, it can not be denied that the punitive damages system has played an important role in the countries of Anglo American law system. Especially in the contract also played a larger role. The countries of the continental law system have been disputed on the application of punitive damages in the contract, and the punitive compensation system is used less in the countries or regions of the continental law system, but the punitive damages system in the Anglo American legal system has been widely used in the contract and has made a great deal. This article explores the system of punitive damages in the field of contract in China. Based on the function and value of the system of punitive damages, this paper analyses the system of punitive damages in the light of the status of punitive damages in the field of contract in our country, and then puts forward the suggestion of needling, in order to perfect the field of contract in our country. In particular, the full text is divided into five parts. The introduction part of this paper states that punitive damages system is widely used in Anglo American countries, and punitive damages in the countries or regions of the continental law system are gradually applied, and the punitive damages system is applied in the field of contract. The first part of this article, "a summary of the system of punitive damages", first defined the punitive compensation system and discussed the characteristics of the punitive compensation system. Secondly, it also explored the function of the punitive compensation system and explored the system and compensation of punitive damages again. The relationship and difference between the two parties. Finally, the relationship between the punitive damages system and the punitive compensation system of the contract is preliminarily discussed, and the relations and differences between the two are also discussed. From this, we can see that the punitive damages system has its own characteristics, and there exists between the punitive compensation system and the compensatory compensation system between the two. The second part of this article, "the theoretical foundation of the punitive damages system", discusses the value of punitive damages system, the dispute on the principle of the punitive compensation system and the contract law, the various theories applicable to the punitive damages system in the contract field; finally, the punitive damages system is found in the contract field. The punitive compensation system is introduced into the contract, there are certain disputes. The focus of the main dispute is that the contract law is private law, the punitive damages system has a certain public law color, the punitive compensation system is introduced into the contract, the contract is adjusted, the punishment is great, it is not conducive to the order of the market economy. In this part, the author makes a series of analysis and Discussion on the system of punitive damages, and finally draws his own opinion. The third part of this article, "a comparative analysis of punitive damages", first analyses the punitive damages system in ancient and modern China, and then it is typical of the Anglo American law system. The state or the United States, the United States, the typical countries or regions of the continental law system, that is, the punitive damages system in the Taiwan area, in the contract field, has been preliminarily discussed. Finally, the Enlightenment of the punitive damages system applied in the foreign countries or regions in the contract field is drawn. The author thinks that the contract of other countries or regions is the contract. A preliminary discussion on the application of punitive damages in the field has a certain reference significance to our country. The fourth part of this article, "the legislative status of punitive damages in the field of contract and the feasibility and necessity of its implementation", is the first part of the legislative status of the punitive compensation system in the present contract domain of China. This paper discusses and analyzes the feasibility and necessity of establishing punitive damages in the field of contract in China. The fifth part of this article "consummates the punitive damages system applicable in the field of China's contract". This part is the author's perfection of punitive damages system in the field of China's contract. Some suggestions are put forward, mainly from the scope of the application of punitive damages, the conditions of application, the amount of compensation and the judicial procedure. At the end of this article, there are some defects in the application of punitive damages in the field of contract at the present stage, but the system of punitive damages The application of the contract in our country has certain feasibility and necessity. It is necessary for us to improve and develop the system of punitive damages in the field of contract, such as the scope of application, the applicable conditions, the amount of compensation and the judicial procedure.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.294;D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘仲秋,王贺洋;惩罚性赔偿制度的应用[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
2 程爱军;;惩罚性赔偿制度的民族适应性分析[J];中共太原市委党校学报;2006年01期
3 龚斌;;论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的立法完善[J];湖南财经高等专科学校学报;2006年02期
4 阳高峰;朱玉;;论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的建立[J];商场现代化;2006年28期
5 于斌;;惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J];科技经济市场;2006年12期
6 房文静;;浅论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的建立[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
7 邢希萌;;浅谈惩罚性赔偿制度的完善[J];北方经贸;2007年06期
8 于朝印;;美国惩罚性赔偿制度探析——兼论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国立法中的确立[J];中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
9 李杰;;对惩罚性赔偿制度的思考[J];毕节学院学报;2008年03期
10 戴江波;;试论惩罚性赔偿制度[J];山西警官高等专科学校学报;2009年02期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 柯新华;;试论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的构建[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年
2 罗冠杰;;论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国药品安全责任领域的建立[A];2009年中国药学会药事管理专业委员会年会暨“国家药物政策与《药品管理法》修订研究”论坛论文文集[C];2009年
3 王阿丽;;商品房买卖中惩罚性赔偿制度分析[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年
4 沈薇;;论电视购物买卖中的惩罚性赔偿制度[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第1辑)[C];2010年
5 赵欣怡;;《环境保护法》修改之环境法律责任的完善——浅析惩罚性赔偿制度对环境民事侵权责任的借鉴[A];可持续发展·环境保护·防灾减灾——2012年全国环境资源法学研究会(年会)论文集[C];2012年
6 周晋凌;李s,
本文编号:2093356
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2093356.html