违约责任中的所获利益赔偿研究
发布时间：2018-07-17 09:05
【摘要】：传统合同损害赔偿中的利益分为期待利益、信赖利益和回复利益,它们都严格以"受害方的损害"为中心。实践中,所获利益赔偿作为一种独立的赔偿利益已经获得某些国家司法实践的认可。所获利益存在的根据在于这种利益能够更好地实现合同利益均衡以及合同法的目的和政策,因为合同法基于某些原因不可避免地具有行为禁止或威慑的功能。所获利益赔偿具有比较独特的构成要件,该构成要件强调违约人获得利益、违约人获得利益与违约行为之间有因果关系以及期待利益赔偿不能实现合同目的或合同法的目的。传统的损害赔偿模式不能有效解释在实践中应赋予所获利益赔偿的类型。当然,所获赔偿没有也不可能颠覆传统的损害赔偿原则,但确实提供了有力补充。
[Abstract]:The interests in the traditional contract damage compensation are divided into expectation interest, trust interest and recovery interest, which are strictly centered on the "injured party's damage". In practice, the benefit compensation as an independent compensation interest has been recognized by the judicial practice of some countries. The existence of benefits is based on the fact that such interests can better achieve the balance of contract interests and the purpose and policy of contract law, because the contract law inevitably has the function of prohibition or deterrence for some reasons. The benefit compensation obtained has a relatively unique constitutive element, which emphasizes that the defaulter obtains the benefit, that there is a causal relationship between the breaching party's interest and the breach of contract, and that the expected interest compensation cannot achieve the purpose of the contract or the contract law. The traditional damage compensation model can not effectively explain the types of benefit compensation that should be given in practice. Of course, the compensation received does not and cannot subvert the traditional principle of damages, but it does provide a powerful complement.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年项目“合同法中信息披露义务的研究”(06JC82005) 吉林大学人文社会科学青年项目“从文本到语境”(2007QN005)
【分类号】：D913
本文编号：2129926
[Abstract]:The interests in the traditional contract damage compensation are divided into expectation interest, trust interest and recovery interest, which are strictly centered on the "injured party's damage". In practice, the benefit compensation as an independent compensation interest has been recognized by the judicial practice of some countries. The existence of benefits is based on the fact that such interests can better achieve the balance of contract interests and the purpose and policy of contract law, because the contract law inevitably has the function of prohibition or deterrence for some reasons. The benefit compensation obtained has a relatively unique constitutive element, which emphasizes that the defaulter obtains the benefit, that there is a causal relationship between the breaching party's interest and the breach of contract, and that the expected interest compensation cannot achieve the purpose of the contract or the contract law. The traditional damage compensation model can not effectively explain the types of benefit compensation that should be given in practice. Of course, the compensation received does not and cannot subvert the traditional principle of damages, but it does provide a powerful complement.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年项目“合同法中信息披露义务的研究”(06JC82005) 吉林大学人文社会科学青年项目“从文本到语境”(2007QN005)
【分类号】：D913
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 钟奇江;;论非财产性损害合同救济正当性的理论基础[J];理论探讨;2006年01期
2 钟奇江;;论非财产性损害的合同救济[J];湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李靖源;我国行政合同救济制度初探[D];延边大学;2006年
，本文编号：2129926
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2129926.html
