法学发展的“十字现象”——以物权行为制度与《合同法》第51条为说明主体

发布时间：2018-07-29 10:28

【摘要】：由于我国法学发展忽略“十字现象”,民法典不采物权行为制度似已成定论,并决定采用意思主义辅之以交付、登记制度;惟此一制度确有窒碍难行之处,是否即应采用,兹事体大,仍值再予辨证。本文论述不限于理论,并提出数例说明;此外《合同法》第51条规定之误,亦一并叙之。文中分别介绍不采物权行为制度的主要见解,及本文对其之评释;并分举数例以说明不同制度的优劣;同时探讨意思主义下的物权变动模式,其内容涉及法国民法模式、日本民法模式,与我国学者所创设的模式;最后并以法律经济分析法,探究是否应采用物权行为制度与《合同法》第51条规定的交易成本辨析,以为我国民法典立法应采用物权行为制度之佐证。
[Abstract]:Because the "cross phenomenon" is ignored in the development of our country's jurisprudence, the system of non-adoption of the act of real right in the Civil Code seems to have come to a conclusion, and it has been decided that the system of intention doctrine should be supplemented by delivery and registration system. As a matter of great importance, it is still worth differentiating the symptoms and signs. This paper is not limited to theory, and several examples are given. In addition, the mistakes in Article 51 of contract Law are also described. This paper respectively introduces the main opinions of the system of non-real right act, and the comments and interpretations of it in this paper, and gives several examples to illustrate the merits and demerits of different systems. Meanwhile, it discusses the mode of property right change under the doctrine of will, which involves the French civil law model. The model of Japanese civil law, and the model created by Chinese scholars; finally, by the method of legal and economic analysis, the author explores whether the system of real right act should be adopted and the transaction cost stipulated in Article 51 of contract Law. The author thinks that the legislation of civil code of our country should be supported by the system of real right act.
【作者单位】：浙江大学法学院
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】