买卖不破租赁规则的法律研究
发布时间:2018-07-29 15:53
【摘要】:我国《合同法》第229条是关于“买卖不破租赁”规则的规定,但其只是对以往法律和司法解释进行了总结和沿袭,并没有实质性的突破和进展。限于十几年前理论研究水平有限,司法实践中所暴露的问题不如当今社会纷繁复杂,立法技术不甚先进,使之规定过于简单笼统。 在本文的论述中,笔者对买卖不破租赁规则进行了分析,挖掘了该规则存在的意义与价值,参照国外立法,在合理借鉴其高超的立法技术和先进理念的情况下,结合中国国情,对我国的买卖不破租赁规则提出了立法建议,以期使之更加完善。 文章主要分为以下三大部分: 第一章从一个案例入手,对比一审法院和二审法院的不同判决,引出三个主要的争议问题,界定了文章的讨论范围。这三个争议点贯穿全文,分别涉及买卖不破租赁的构成要件和三方当事人之间的法律关系问题,是实践中最容易出问题的环节。 第二章是对买卖不破租赁规则的剖析,,其中包括对上述案例中的争议点进行详细的分析和讨论,其他有助于理解买卖不破租赁规则和解决案例争议点的问题也在此展开,主要包括:简单交代买卖不破租赁的概念,探讨了租赁权的属性,为下文具体分析争议点奠定基础,并以此来揭示买卖不破租赁规则的法律价值和存在意义。三个争议点的具体解决部分是实践中争议最多,操作最难,也是和三方当事人联系最为密切的。而细化此规则的构成要件及各方当事人的权利义务关系,有助于在司法实践中简易此规则的操作性,使其发挥应有的作用。 第三章主要对文中案例的处理意见进行了简述。因争议点的存在是由于规则自身构建不完善所造成的,上文分析了这些缺陷给司法实践带来的不确定性,笔者在此部分主要是解决问题,并有所对应的提出具体的立法建议,以期完善我国的买卖不破租赁规则,达到减少讼源与安定秩序的目的。
[Abstract]:Article 229 of contract Law of our country is about the rule of "buying and selling without breaking lease", but it only summarizes and follows the legal and judicial interpretations of the past, and there is no substantial breakthrough and progress. Limited to the limited level of theoretical research more than ten years ago, the problems exposed in the judicial practice are not as complicated as the current society, and the legislative technology is not very advanced, which makes its provisions too simple and general. In this paper, the author analyzes the rule of unbreakable lease, excavates the significance and value of the rule, referring to the foreign legislation, under the circumstances of reasonable reference to its superb legislative technology and advanced ideas, combined with the national conditions of China. In order to make it more perfect, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on the rule of unbreakable lease in our country. The article is divided into the following three parts: chapter one begins with a case, compares the different judgments of the court of first instance and the court of second instance, leads to three main controversial issues, and defines the scope of discussion of the article. These three points of dispute run through the full text, which respectively involve the constitutive elements of buying and selling unbroken lease and the legal relationship between the three parties, which is the most easily problematic link in practice. The second chapter is the analysis of the rules of unbreakable lease, including the detailed analysis and discussion of the dispute points in the above cases, and the other problems which are helpful to understand the rules of unbreakable lease and to resolve the dispute points in the case. The main contents are as follows: a brief account of the concept of unbreakable lease, a discussion of the attributes of the lease right, to lay a foundation for the following specific analysis of disputes, and to reveal the legal value and significance of the rule of unbroken lease. The specific settlement of the three points of dispute is the most controversial in practice, the most difficult to operate, and the closest contact with the three parties. It is helpful to simplify the operation of the rule in judicial practice and to make it play its due role by refining the constitutive elements of the rule and the relationship between the rights and obligations of the parties. In the third chapter, the author gives a brief account of the cases in this paper. Because the existence of the dispute point is caused by the imperfect construction of the rules themselves, the author analyzes the uncertainty brought about by these defects to the judicial practice above. In this part, the author mainly solves the problem and puts forward some specific legislative suggestions. In order to perfect the rules of leasing, to reduce the source of litigation and stability.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6
本文编号:2153179
[Abstract]:Article 229 of contract Law of our country is about the rule of "buying and selling without breaking lease", but it only summarizes and follows the legal and judicial interpretations of the past, and there is no substantial breakthrough and progress. Limited to the limited level of theoretical research more than ten years ago, the problems exposed in the judicial practice are not as complicated as the current society, and the legislative technology is not very advanced, which makes its provisions too simple and general. In this paper, the author analyzes the rule of unbreakable lease, excavates the significance and value of the rule, referring to the foreign legislation, under the circumstances of reasonable reference to its superb legislative technology and advanced ideas, combined with the national conditions of China. In order to make it more perfect, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on the rule of unbreakable lease in our country. The article is divided into the following three parts: chapter one begins with a case, compares the different judgments of the court of first instance and the court of second instance, leads to three main controversial issues, and defines the scope of discussion of the article. These three points of dispute run through the full text, which respectively involve the constitutive elements of buying and selling unbroken lease and the legal relationship between the three parties, which is the most easily problematic link in practice. The second chapter is the analysis of the rules of unbreakable lease, including the detailed analysis and discussion of the dispute points in the above cases, and the other problems which are helpful to understand the rules of unbreakable lease and to resolve the dispute points in the case. The main contents are as follows: a brief account of the concept of unbreakable lease, a discussion of the attributes of the lease right, to lay a foundation for the following specific analysis of disputes, and to reveal the legal value and significance of the rule of unbroken lease. The specific settlement of the three points of dispute is the most controversial in practice, the most difficult to operate, and the closest contact with the three parties. It is helpful to simplify the operation of the rule in judicial practice and to make it play its due role by refining the constitutive elements of the rule and the relationship between the rights and obligations of the parties. In the third chapter, the author gives a brief account of the cases in this paper. Because the existence of the dispute point is caused by the imperfect construction of the rules themselves, the author analyzes the uncertainty brought about by these defects to the judicial practice above. In this part, the author mainly solves the problem and puts forward some specific legislative suggestions. In order to perfect the rules of leasing, to reduce the source of litigation and stability.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱伯玉;“买卖不破租赁”的法理学分析[J];商业研究;2003年19期
2 柴振国,赵英;关于"让与不破租赁"的几个问题[J];法律适用;2005年02期
3 康临芳;买卖不破租赁相关问题探讨[J];法律适用;2005年11期
4 黄晓林,张国华;不动产抵押权与租赁权的冲突与协调[J];法学杂志;2002年04期
5 王丽;;浅谈房屋租赁权的对抗力[J];经济师;2007年05期
6 张泽忠;有关抵押权与租赁权效力的法理分析[J];江西社会科学;2001年08期
7 梁慧星;;融资性租赁契约法性质论[J];法学研究;1992年04期
8 王利明;试论我国不动产登记制度的完善(上)[J];求索;2001年05期
9 王利明;试论我国不动产登记制度的完善(下)[J];求索;2001年06期
10 董学立;论租赁权的性质[J];山东警察学院学报;2005年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张韵琴;论买卖不破租赁[D];山西大学;2004年
2 胡卫国;论买卖不破租赁规则[D];湘潭大学;2006年
3 姜振国;论买卖不破租赁规则[D];苏州大学;2008年
本文编号:2153179
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2153179.html