企业间借贷合同的效力认定及责任承担
发布时间:2018-08-20 15:02
【摘要】:企业间借贷合同符合合同法原理,现行政策及有关立法并未一概否定其效力,原有司法解释缺乏法律依据,现已着手修改,并已先行对部分企业之间变相借贷合同的效力予以认可,因此,应确认企业间借贷合同的效力。从经济学上说,利息就是货币的时间价值;在法律上,利息是由作为主债权的金钱债权而产生的法定孳息。因此,在责任承担上,利息的性质决定着在企业间借贷合同中,除本金债权外,利息债权也应予以保护,对此相关判例已经先行一步,期待司法解释能够根据合同法的规定予以明确,以便统一司法尺度。
[Abstract]:The loan contract between enterprises conforms to the principle of contract law, the current policy and relevant legislation does not negate its effect, the original judicial interpretation lacks the legal basis, and has now begun to amend. Therefore, the validity of inter-firm loan contract should be confirmed. In economics, interest is the time value of money; in law, interest is the civil fruits of monetary claims as principal claims. Therefore, in terms of liability, the nature of interest determines that in inter-firm lending contracts, interest claims should also be protected in addition to principal claims. It is expected that the judicial interpretation can be defined according to the provisions of contract law, so as to unify the judicial yardstick.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学法学院 中国人民大学法学院
【分类号】:D923
[Abstract]:The loan contract between enterprises conforms to the principle of contract law, the current policy and relevant legislation does not negate its effect, the original judicial interpretation lacks the legal basis, and has now begun to amend. Therefore, the validity of inter-firm loan contract should be confirmed. In economics, interest is the time value of money; in law, interest is the civil fruits of monetary claims as principal claims. Therefore, in terms of liability, the nature of interest determines that in inter-firm lending contracts, interest claims should also be protected in addition to principal claims. It is expected that the judicial interpretation can be defined according to the provisions of contract law, so as to unify the judicial yardstick.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学法学院 中国人民大学法学院
【分类号】:D923
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戚枝淬;合同解除的溯及力和法律后果[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
2 孔东菊;违约责任与侵权责任之比较研究[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
3 葛云松;;判决书[J];北大法律评论;1998年02期
4 杨柠;;论可撤销合同[J];保定学院学报;2009年06期
5 周昀;;从垄断协议的特质看其对传统民商事合同概念理论的突破[J];比较法研究;2010年04期
6 郭云,
本文编号:2194062
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2194062.html