信息许可协议的效力寻求自由与限制之间的合理边界

发布时间：2018-08-30 20:26

【摘要】：信息在经济活动中的价值日益彰显,但现有的知识产权法没有给予信息恰当的定位,信息许可协议成为信息生产者价值实现的主要甚至唯一的方式。知识产权法定主义者认为,超越知识产权法定边界的信息许可协议无效。另一些学者则主张尊重合同自由,法定知识产权只是协议的模版和缺省规则。信息许可协议是一把双刃剑,在知识产权出现类型化不足时,可以有效填补知识产权的缝隙,但借助协议任意创设和扩张知识产权,则将侵蚀公共领域。必须为信息许可协议划定一个边界,在遵循合同法、竞争法等一般原则基础上,在信息产品的可替代性、信息使用者的类型、信息使用目的以及限制性条款的影响等具体环节作出理性的判断。
[Abstract]:The value of information in economic activities is becoming more and more obvious, but the existing intellectual property law does not properly position information, and information licensing agreements become the main or even the only way to realize the value of information producers. Intellectual property legalists believe that information licensing agreements that transcend the legal boundaries of intellectual property rights are invalid. Others argue that freedom of contract is respected, and that legal intellectual property rights are only templates and default rules of the agreement. Information licensing agreement is a double-edged sword. When the type of intellectual property is insufficient, it can effectively fill the gap of intellectual property rights, but the arbitrary creation and expansion of intellectual property rights by virtue of the agreement will erode the public domain. A boundary must be drawn for an information licensing agreement, based on the general principles of contract law, competition law, the substitutability of information products, the type of information user, The purpose of the use of information and the impact of restrictive clauses and other specific links to make a rational judgment.
【作者单位】：山东师范大学政法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2010年部级法学研究课题“证券交易信息的法律保护”的阶段性研究成果,项目批准号:CLS-D1065
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】