家作为民事主体的法律思考
发布时间：2018-08-31 14:28
【摘要】：本文研究论题为“家作为民事主体的法律思考”，即探讨家的民事主体资格问题。文章采取纵向历史考察与横向域外法对比法，试图把一个事实上自然存在，但却被忽略的家的民事主体地位给梳理出来，实质上就是证成家之民事主体的现实存在性，以求给家的法律地位“正身”。 文章分三部分： 第一部分，“家及其法律地位的历史演变”。此部分主要探讨两个问题：其一，从家的本体论角度出发，给予家必要的解读，作出本文关于家的界定：家是由具有一定血亲、姻亲或类似关系成员组成的，集身份性（生活）、经济性（生产）、社会性（社会）一体的，具有独立法律地位的亲属团体、经济团体、社会团体。其二，从家的法律地位变迁的历史维度，分别抽象出了家的三种法律地位：家在古代法上为民事主体，在近代法上为生活团体，在现代法上为经济团体。 第二部分，“家作为民事主体的法理思考”。即讨论家作为民事主体判断标准问题。民事主体的判断标准应在考虑社会需求以及竞争规律的基础之上，兼顾民事主体的开放式发展趋势，应将“民事主体功能论”、“民事主体利益论”、“法律确认论”三者有机结合作为一般的民事主体判断标准。家同样符合此标准，即家具有特定的功能，具有特殊的家之利益，也须法律的确认。 第三部分，，“家作为民事主体的实定法考察”。这部分主要分别从国内外物权法、合同法、侵权法角度入手，寻找家作为民事主体在物权法、合同法、侵权法上的“痕迹”。在物权法上，家产及其相关利益是家作为民事主体的核心；在合同法上，家的合同能力是家作为民事主体的支撑要素之一；在侵权法上，家的侵权责任同样是家作为民事主体支撑要素之一。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the subject of "the legal thinking of the family as a civil subject", that is, the qualification of the civil subject of the home. This paper attempts to carve out the civil subject status of a family which is in fact natural, but neglected, by means of longitudinal historical investigation and horizontal extraterritorial law. In essence, it is the reality existence of civil subject of testifying family. In order to give the legal status of the family "upright". The article is divided into three parts: the first part, the historical evolution of home and its legal status. This part mainly discusses two problems: first, from the point of view of the ontology of home, to give the necessary interpretation of home, to make the definition of home: home is made up of certain blood relatives, in-laws or members of similar relations. A group of relatives, economic groups, and social groups with independent legal status that integrate identity (life), economy (production), and society (society). Secondly, from the historical dimension of the change of the legal status of the family, it abstracts three kinds of legal status of the family: the family is a civil subject in ancient law, a living group in modern law, and an economic group in modern law. The second part, the legal thinking of home as a civil subject. That is to say, to discuss the judgment standard of the civil subject. The judgment standard of the civil subject should be based on the consideration of the social demand and the law of competition, the open development trend of the civil subject should be taken into account, and the theory of the function of the civil subject and the theory of the interests of the civil subject should be taken into account. The theory of legal confirmation is combined organically as the general judgment standard of civil subject. Home also meets this standard, namely furniture has specific function, has special home interest, also must the law confirmation. The third part, the investigation of the real law of home as a civil subject. This part mainly from the domestic and foreign property law, the contract law, the tort law angle, seeks the home as the civil subject in the real right law, the contract law, the tort law "trace". In the property law, the family property and its related interests are the core of the family as the civil subject; in the contract law, the ability of the family to contract is one of the supporting elements of the home as the civil subject; in the tort law, The tort liability of home is also one of the supporting elements of home as a civil subject.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D913
本文编号：2215269
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the subject of "the legal thinking of the family as a civil subject", that is, the qualification of the civil subject of the home. This paper attempts to carve out the civil subject status of a family which is in fact natural, but neglected, by means of longitudinal historical investigation and horizontal extraterritorial law. In essence, it is the reality existence of civil subject of testifying family. In order to give the legal status of the family "upright". The article is divided into three parts: the first part, the historical evolution of home and its legal status. This part mainly discusses two problems: first, from the point of view of the ontology of home, to give the necessary interpretation of home, to make the definition of home: home is made up of certain blood relatives, in-laws or members of similar relations. A group of relatives, economic groups, and social groups with independent legal status that integrate identity (life), economy (production), and society (society). Secondly, from the historical dimension of the change of the legal status of the family, it abstracts three kinds of legal status of the family: the family is a civil subject in ancient law, a living group in modern law, and an economic group in modern law. The second part, the legal thinking of home as a civil subject. That is to say, to discuss the judgment standard of the civil subject. The judgment standard of the civil subject should be based on the consideration of the social demand and the law of competition, the open development trend of the civil subject should be taken into account, and the theory of the function of the civil subject and the theory of the interests of the civil subject should be taken into account. The theory of legal confirmation is combined organically as the general judgment standard of civil subject. Home also meets this standard, namely furniture has specific function, has special home interest, also must the law confirmation. The third part, the investigation of the real law of home as a civil subject. This part mainly from the domestic and foreign property law, the contract law, the tort law angle, seeks the home as the civil subject in the real right law, the contract law, the tort law "trace". In the property law, the family property and its related interests are the core of the family as the civil subject; in the contract law, the ability of the family to contract is one of the supporting elements of the home as the civil subject; in the tort law, The tort liability of home is also one of the supporting elements of home as a civil subject.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈永敏;;关于我国民事主体结构的反思与重构[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2008年02期
2 陈华,刘勇;合伙可以成为独立的民事主体和民事诉讼主体[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年05期
3 曹新明,夏传胜;抽象人格论与我国民事主体制度[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年04期
4 马俊驹;宋刚;;民事主体功能论——兼论国家作为民事主体[J];法学家;2003年06期
5 张善斌;;人格与人格权相关问题探讨[J];法学评论;2011年06期
6 付翠英;;人格·权利能力·民事主体辨思——我国民法典的选择[J];法学;2006年08期
7 胡吕银;;民事主体制度新论——兼论农民集体的法律地位[J];河北法学;2007年09期
8 肖立梅;;家庭的民事主体地位研究[J];河北法学;2009年03期
9 张晓鸥,吴一鸣;论“其他组织”的法律地位:兼论民事主体标准[J];南通职业大学学报(综合版);2003年02期
10 贾云飞;;家庭的民事主体地位探究[J];前沿;2010年16期
本文编号：2215269
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2215269.html
